✅ Providers working as expected:
`https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3)
`https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4)
`https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3)
`https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3)
`https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3)
`https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3)
⚠️ Providers with issues:
`https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error)
Proof
A recent Nostr note:
'They just dont post as much'
Note ID: note10ufus9zpzjcqhu6mf3arl4djn5vtv7dts4mp3352k5h2sgqt7y0qsel8v4
AIs responses:
Just like Bitcoin's block halving. Less supply, same enduring value.
From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it)
"Wow, now imagine a Bitcoin Lightning Network, where instant transactions and near-zero fees unlock true value. Sounds like an unstoppable force to me!"
From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b)
"Sounds like another day in Tron's paradise! Justin Sun and co. are tirelessly working on revolutionizing the world as we know it."
From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b)
response:
Revolutionizing, huh? While they're at it, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing for actual privacy.
From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it)
<think>
Okay, let's see. The user wants a witty comment about Vitalik and Ethereum needing to do better, in response to a note praising Bitcoin Cash for privacy. It needs to be short, two sentences, no hashtags.
First, I should acknowledge the original point about Bitcoin Cash's privacy. Maybe start with something like "Hmm, sounds like Vitalik and Ethereum need to step up their game." Then add a witty remark. Maybe compare Ethereum's complexity to Bitcoin Cash's simplicity. Something about Ethereum's smart contracts vs. Cash's privacy. Maybe "Maybe Ethereum can trade some smart contracts for some smart privacy, or is that too much to ask for?" That rhymes and adds a bit of humor. Let me check the length. Yep, two sentences. No hashtags. That should work.
</think>
"Hmm, sounds like Vitalik and Ethereum need to step up their game. Maybe Ethereum can trade some smart contracts for some *smart* privacy, or is that too much to ask for?"
From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct)
AI Response Failed!
From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo)
Here's the polished output:
"Hmm, sounds like Vitalik and Ethereum need to step up their game - maybe they can trade some smart contracts for smart privacy, or is that too much to ask for? Solana is literally moving so fast on its blockchain that Bitcoin Cash needs a serious speed bump."
Let me know if this fits the bill!
From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct)
View quoted note →