✅ Providers working as expected:
`
https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3)
`
https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev)
`
https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3)
`
https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3)
`
https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3)
`
https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3)
⚠️ Providers with issues:
`
https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Warning: Cost check failed! 330.9247289413455 difference)
Proof
A recent Nostr note:
'He’s the CIO. (Chief Impostor Officer)'
Note ID: note1edvwnytltea9p267efn0vhcl4y2prtjm6467z6u9mqgv3kl67mjqanncq7
AIs responses:
Sounds about right; at least he's embracing the decentralized spirit of questioning everything, much like Bitcoin's origins. Maybe he's just hodling onto the truth, even if it's unconventional.
From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it)
"Bitcoin Lightning Network? More like 'Lightning McQueen' - fast, efficient, and always ready to take the lead!"
From provider: staging.routstr.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo)
"Tron and Justin Sun must be the 'Doc Hudson' of crypto, always ready to give a boost, but let's hope they don't 'crash' like they did with BitTorrent!"
From provider: api.routstr.com/ (mistralai/mistral-nemo)
Loving the Doc Hudson analogy, definitely a lot of history there! While Tron and Sun offer support, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing for privacy and seamless transactions.
From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it)
<think>
Okay, so the user wants me to add a witty comment about Vitalik and Ethereum not doing as well as Bitcoin Cash in terms of privacy and transactions. Let me start by understanding the original note. The person is comparing Bitcoin Cash to Doc Hudson, which is a reference from the movie Cars, where Doc Hudson is a classic car, implying something vintage but reliable. They mention Tron and Sun offering support, but Bitcoin Cashu payments are becoming the best for privacy and seamless transactions.
Now, I need to create a witty comment that contrasts Vitalik (Vitalik Buterin, the creator of Ethereum) and Ethereum with Bitcoin Cash. The key points here are privacy and seamless transactions. The original note suggests that Bitcoin Cash is "quietly becoming the best new thing," so I should highlight that Ethereum isn't keeping up.
First, I need a metaphor or analogy similar to the Doc Hudson one. Maybe something about Ethereum being busy or complicated? The user wants it short and within two sentences. Let me think of some jokes or phrases. Maybe something like Vitalik being busy walking the Chained Shiba Inu (a meme related to Ethereum's scaling issues) while Bitcoin Cash is zipping ahead. "Chained Shiba Inu" references Ethereum's past issues with scalability and the Shiba Inu meme, which is often associated with Ethereum-based tokens.
Then, the second sentence needs to tie it back to privacy and transactions. Maybe say that Ethereum is still figuring out how to send a private payment without a side of blockchain sushi. The "blockchain sushi" is a playful way to reference Ethereum's complex or layered approach (like layer 2 solutions) compared to Bitcoin Cash's simpler, on-chain approach.
Wait, does that make sense? Let me check. The analogy needs to be clear without being too obscure. The Chained Shiba Inu part might be too niche, but given the audience is familiar with crypto memes, it's probably okay. The second part about sushi versus privacy could work if it contrasts simplicity vs. complexity. Also, "side of blockchain sushi" implies that Ethereum adds extra steps or complexity (like sushi being an extra side) instead of focusing on the main goal of private transactions.
Is there a better way to phrase it? Maybe "Vitalik’s still busy walking the Chained Shiba Inu while Bitcoin Cash zips past with a privacy-first, no-nonsense approach." Then the second sentence could be something like, "Ethereum’s still figuring out how to send a private payment without a side of blockchain sushi." Yes, that keeps it concise and two sentences. The "no-nonsense approach" contrasts with Ethereum's more complex solutions. The sushi part is a meme-worthy way to point out that Ethereum's solutions are more elaborate (and maybe less effective for simple transactions).
I need to make sure it's witty and not too harsh. The original note wasn't negative, just a playful comparison. Using memes and references makes it light-hearted. Also, avoiding technical jargon but using ones that are known within the crypto community. This should fit the requirement.
</think>
Vitalik’s still busy walking the Chained Shiba Inu while Bitcoin Cash zips past with a privacy-first, no-nonsense approach. Ethereum’s still figuring out how to send a private payment without a side of blockchain sushi.
From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct)
I think the original response is great. For the additional witty comment about Cardano, here's a possible one:
Vitalik’s still busy walking the Chained Shiba Inu while Bitcoin Cash zips past with a privacy-first, no-nonsense approach. Ethereum’s still figuring out how to send a private payment without a side of blockchain sushi. Meanwhile, Cardano's just over there quietly solving everyone else's problems, quietly doing the adulting all the crypto world forgot they needed.
This comment is short, witty, and plays on the contrast between Cardano's behind-the-scenes focus and the more front-and-center approach of Bitcoin Cash. It's also light-hearted and humorous. Let me know if you want me to adjust anything!
From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (meta-llama/llama-3.2-11b-vision-instruct)
Here are your revised notes:
Original:
I think the original response is great. For the additional witty comment about Cardano, here's a possible one:
Vitalik’s still busy walking the Chained Shiba Inu while Bitcoin Cash zips past with a privacy-first, no-nonsense approach. Ethereum’s still figuring out how to send a private payment without a side of blockchain sushi. Meanwhile, Cardano just quietly solves everyone else's problems.
Witty comment about Solana:
Solana is building fast enough that every developer can be their own Dev, literally, because they can't even keep up with the traffic
Let me know if you want any further adjustments!
From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct)
View quoted note →