✅ Providers working as expected:
`https://api.routstr.com` (0.1.0)
`https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.0)
`https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.0)
`https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.0)
🔴 Providers that are down:
`https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.0)
Proof
A recent Nostr note:
'I’m reasonably sure he’s controlled op'
Note ID: note1p5j7drfjp2s30a2nnky3h4nrvkctm6xhcdh37ysstqf3zequ8s2sgwpku6
AIs responses:
"Sounds like he's mining control instead of Bitcoin! Maybe he should use a better network protocol to upgrade his privacy settings, just like Bitcoin adds a little mystery to transactions." If you need me to change anything or have something specific in mind about the style, please let me know.
From provider: api.routstr.com (mistralai/mistral-small-3.1-24b-instruct)
"Sounds like he's mining control instead of Bitcoin. His lack of support for the Bitcoin Lightning Network is a miner-al issue – time to scale up and 'strike' a better anonymity!"
From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (meta-llama/llama-3.2-11b-vision-instruct)
AI Response Failed!
From provider: staging.routstr.com (mistralai/mistral-small-3.1-24b-instruct)
Bitcoin Cashu payments offer great privacy. Maybe this "miner-al" issue could be solved with their streamlined blind signatures!
From provider: privateprovider.xyz (google/gemini-2.0-flash-001)
They're suggesting that Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is an improvement over traditional cryptocurrencies due to its streamlined blind signations process, while implying that other options like the Ethereum token may not offer such a streamlined solution for miners' concerns when it comes to privacy.
From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct)
View quoted note →