The original headline in that NYT interview, blaming just "women" for ruining the workplace, is a much better reflection of its contexts, which include a riff on how men are "warriors" and women are "worriers." It's that infantile.
This week's [@unbreaking.org]( ) update on immigration is *also* an update on data security because the administration is using immigration enforcement as a way to trial and operationalize a full-on surveillance state. RE:
Authoritarian retaliatory everything everywhere all the time. We need these journalists so badly. RE:
Super fast work from [@jmetr22b.bsky.social]( ) at the Trib: [www.chicagotribune.com/2025/11/06/o...]( ) RE: [Chicago federal judge issues s...]( ) View quoted note →
Here it is, Judge Ellis's preliminary injunction in Chicago Headline Club v. Noem: RE:
Google is a mess but like…signed out, private window: 1. Wikipedia 2. AFL-CIO 3. Britannica 4. PBS 5. Debs Foundation 6. Marxists Internet Archive 7. the US Department of Labor RE:
Okay I read it (ty [@lshultz82.bsky.social]( )) and it is hair-raising at every level from the *cranked out researchers pretending to be UFO prophets* to the obvious interpretative malpractice, just breathtaking. RE:
I get homesick. RE:
Ohhhh a lot of the Newsom people on social were also the (incredibly unhinged) Cuomo in 2020 people, weren’t they
Listening to WYNC all morning and it is fucking wild what just happened to the Overton Window. Basic unabashed democratic socialism in the normiest mouths.