Did the DOJ's demand for technology companies to remove immigration tracking apps come with implicit threats? EFF is suing to find out.
In October, AG Pam Bondi demanded that companies like Apple remove apps that allow users to document immigration activity in their community. We're suing to get the underlying communications.
It's no secret that 2025 has given Americans plenty to protest about. But as news cameras showed protesters filling streets of cities across the country, cops were watching those streets through different lenses: Flock Safety license plate readers that tracked every car.
The USPTO wants new rules that would slam the door on inter partes review—the only affordable way the public can fight junk patents.
📢 BREAKING 📢 We're suing the departments of Justice and Homeland Security to get answers about ICE-spotting app takedowns. Read more about our FOIA lawsuit:
Powerful institutions are using automated decision-making against us. Fortunately, workers, patients, and renters are resisting.
You know that police drone in the sky? Those license plate readers? Oh, and the worried feeling you get about your data being collected as you interact with your devices? Yeah, that shouldn't be the norm. That's why we're fighting back: image
Algorithmic face scans are “dangerous, whether used to estimate our age, our name, or other demographics,” EFF’s [@Adam_D_Schwartz]( ) told @npub15d3c...7dna. EFF favors “a ban on government use of this technology, and strict regulation… for corporate use.”
EFF is fighting online tracking without consent, blocking behavioral advertising, and holding law enforcement accountable for illegally accessing your location data. Support our mission to Take Back CTRL today:
🚨BREAKING NEWS🚨 We're suing the city of San Jose for its pervasive ALPR surveillance program. With nearly 500 ALPRs, the SJPD allows its officers to search millions of records, all without a warrant. These unconstitutional searches must be stopped. Read the complaint: