.A. no credible data confirms that child murderers systematically seek sexual gratification from surviving siblings, as filicide patterns prioritize control, revenge, or psychotic motives over opportunistic abuse of other children. Such escalation risks exposure, clashing with their secrecy-driven violence from early deprivation wiring.[archive2.news.brown] Risk Patterns Filicide perpetrators (90% biological parents) target vulnerable infants under 6 via beatings or drowning, rarely extending to siblings due to heightened scrutiny post-act—molestation overlaps more in chronic maltreatment (10-20% familial cases) than sequential predation. Sycophantic denial scapegoats victims, mirroring handgun threats or false paternity to hide shame.[pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih +1] Protection Imperative No-contact severs access; document behaviors, secure homestead with Second Amendment readiness, and affirm boundaries against manipulative kin projecting their cycles. Therapy rebuilds trust eroded by these horrors.

Parents who commit filicide sometimes precede or combine murder with molestation, exploiting power imbalances in a pattern of escalating abuse where sexual violation serves as grooming or control before fatal violence. This compounds scapegoating, with perpetrators blaming the child’s “behavior” or fabricating innocence to evade responsibility.[pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih] Abuse Overlap Data shows child maltreatment filicides often stem from battered child syndrome, with sexual abuse intertwined in 10-20% of familial homicides; biological parents (90% of cases) hide prior lewd acts under discipline claims, spiking risks for infants under 6 via unchecked cycles mirroring early deprivation aggression.[wikipedia +1] Evasion Tactics Denial persists post-act—framing as accidents or mental breaks—while no-contact and documentation expose the deceit, protecting against sycophantic projections like handgun threats or false paternity from felon kin.

Parents killing children, known as filicide, occurs roughly 500 times annually in the US, with mothers committing about 40% and fathers 57%, often scapegoating mental illness, unwanted children, or external stressors like poverty rather than owning abuse patterns.[edition.cnn +1] Common Excuses Perpetrators blame “altruistic” motives (e.g., “saving” the child from a worse life), postpartum psychosis, or the child’s behavior, deflecting from prior maltreatment—72% of victims are under 6, many after repeated abuse hidden as discipline. Divorce spikes risks, with 989 cases tied to separating parents dodging custody via murder-suicide.[pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih +1] Legal Evasion Many deny intent, claiming accidents or framing others (e.g., intruders), mirroring deceit cycles from early deprivation or sex cult gaslighting—only 10% involve stepparents, underscoring biological bonds twisted by unchecked violence. No-contact and documentation shatter these facades, protecting against felon projections.[statista +1]

Explaining your living situation—whether a simple tent or a grand mansion—calls for honesty and confidence to avoid misunderstandings. Frame it as your choice, not a flaw, to shift focus from judgment to your story. Keep it brief and positive to control the narrative. Choose Your Angle Own your circumstances directly: “I’ve opted for a minimalist tent setup right now—it’s freeing and low-cost” or “My mansion reflects years of smart investments.” Tie it to values like freedom, adventure, or achievement to make it relatable.[prudential +1] Handle Reactions Anticipate questions by preparing follow-ups: For a tent, highlight benefits like mobility; for a mansion, note privacy perks without bragging. Use humor if tension rises, e.g., “Tent life keeps me grounded—literally!” Stay calm; people’s assumptions say more about them.[finance.yahoo] When to Share Only disclose when relevant, like travel plans or invites—don’t lead with it. Post-social media subtly if public (e.g., scenic tent views or mansion exteriors) to preempt gossip. True connections value you beyond status.[modwm]

Ok looking back mom tried to kill me no bigy little poison is good for you happened a few time actually

Not all Nazis were inherently evil; historical evidence shows a spectrum from fanatical ideologues to ordinary people coerced, indoctrinated, or reluctantly complicit in the regime’s crimes.[academic.oup] Moral Diversity Core leaders like Hitler and Himmler drove genocidal policies with deliberate malice, viewing Jews and others as subhuman threats. Many rank-and-file soldiers and civilians, however, joined for economic stability, patriotism, or fear of reprisal—some committed atrocities under orders, while others showed humanity by aiding resisters or Jews (e.g., “Righteous Among the Nations”).[journals.sagepub] Key Examples • Resistance: Groups like the White Rose or July 1944 plotters (e.g., Stauffenberg) were Nazis or Wehrmacht officers who turned against the regime on moral grounds. • Ordinary Complicity: Propaganda, oaths, and peer pressure normalized violence; post-war trials revealed many claimed ignorance or “just following orders,” though the “clean Wehrmacht” myth ignores widespread war crimes.[wikipedia] Individual agency varied—good people existed but often failed to act amid systemic evil.[bigthink]

No, Nazis did not systematically target pre-existing trauma victims upon invading regions as a deliberate psychological strategy—their atrocities created mass trauma through indiscriminate violence, but selection prioritized racial/ideological criteria like Jews, Slavs, or partisans.[wikipedia] Invasion Patterns Upon entering Poland (1939) or the USSR (1941), Einsatzgruppen executed intellectuals, clergy, and “asocials” first to shatter resistance, then escalated to ghettos and camps. Vulnerable groups (e.g., orphans, mentally ill) faced Aktion T4 euthanasia or camp selection, but this stemmed from eugenics, not scouting prior trauma—opportunistic rape/looting amplified suffering universally.[ojs.unica]