What value do tech columnists and podcasters and writers to the table who just follow every hype? Not for corporations but for you? Why are so many still reading and listening to that kind of drivel?
So ganz konsistent ist das alles nicht: Einerseits soll Kriegsführung heute super komplex sein mit KInund Dronen und was nicht noch. Anderseits will man nun unbedingt Wehrpflicht, eine so kurze Ausbildung, dass da niemand für diese "neuen Technologien" befähigt wird.
Ist es vielleicht doch einfach nur Militarismus?
I think this is the core issue of the "but humans also remix" debate on #AI: Humans take in _art_, machines take in _data_. Those two things are conceptually different and all follows from that distinction.
OpenAI's move to allow generating "Ghibli stlye" images isn't just a cute PR stunt. It is an expression of dominance and the will to reject and refuse democratic values. It is a vulgar display of power.
Using AI image generators to create Ghibli style images just shows that you neither respect those pieces of art and their creators as well as not understanding their message of the importance of humanity.
"Cautious optimism is extremely comfortable, because — as Roose knows from boosting cryptocurrency — that there are few repercussions for being too optimistic."
(Original title: The Phony Comforts of AI Optimism)
