Debunking Bitcoin’s CIA origins with one question: If Bitcoin were a CIA project… Why does it dismantle the very power structures the CIA exists to protect?

What is pricing the dollar? If it isn’t energy, isn’t labor, isn’t scarcity, isn’t truth… Then what exactly are we measuring?

Engagement culture and hierarchy are siblings. They both train people to: look upward seek validation measure worth externally wait for permission perform for approval Hierarchy says: Your value is determined by rank. Engagement systems say: Your value is determined by response. Same architecture. Different costume.

Old world trained everyone to think: If there’s no engagement, I failed. So when they post on NOSTR and don’t get: likes replies algorithmic amplification dopamine feedback …their nervous system reads it as rejection, not freedom. And they drift away. Not because NOSTR failed them — but because their conditioning hasn’t unwound yet. The old system trained dependency on response Engagement platforms wired people into: feedback loops validation cycles performance identity social reward addiction So expression became transactional: I speak → I receive → I exist. Take away the reward loop, and many suddenly feel: Why am I speaking at all? Which is heartbreaking, honestly — because it shows how deeply external validation replaced internal voice.

Maybe I am blind, as I do not see anyway to force close an inactive channel in Core Lightning on Start9 😏 I submitted an issue in the meantime.

Matter exists to participate, not to be entombed. Same with: money systems institutions laws authority When they start existing only to preserve themselves, they invert their purpose. That’s when the 180-degree rule lights up like a flare. Gold in vaults. Fiat in circulation. People in debt. Flip it: People in sovereignty. Tools in circulation. Value in motion.

Gold surpassed $5K!! So now we’ve got: imaginary money buying imaginary gold to hedge against imaginary money That’s Inception-level abstraction.