So a lot of y'all know I've been hacking on entryway servers for AT Proto (because the old entryway code was becoming a dependency burden), but if an organisation like EuroSky or Northsky wanted to sponsor me to work on an open-source entryway solution, I'd be open to doing that work.

So you might know my work, to support me doing that I need about €60-70k per year. Year to date, I've received €17,150 in financial support from the community, and €11,400 from NLNet grants. So a total of €28,550. Add in whatever freelance work I've been able to pick up and it maybe bumps to €36k

I've been hacking on this all day on and off, and I've got nothing. I need the signing key on the entryway seemingly to create valid JWTs, but the signing key needs to be reserved on the PDS, and you can't be like "oh, here's a signing key to use" I'm pretty sure I'm missing something. RE:

Bluesky Social

Emelia (@thisismissem.social)

Have been hacking on seeing if it's possible to update the PDS entryway tests to use something based on the current version of the @atproto/pds ins...

View quoted note →

Have been hacking on seeing if it's possible to update the PDS entryway tests to use something based on the current version of the @atproto/pds instead of an ancient version. It's vaguely kinda working, but it's still horribly broken, I'm definitely missing something: [github.com/bluesky-soci...](

GitHub

Comparing bluesky-social:main...ThisIsMissEm:feat/entryway-for-tests · bluesky-social/atproto

Social networking technology created by Bluesky. Contribute to bluesky-social/atproto development by creating an account on GitHub.

) [Comparing bluesky-social:main....](

GitHub

Comparing bluesky-social:main...ThisIsMissEm:feat/entryway-for-tests · bluesky-social/atproto

Social networking technology created by Bluesky. Contribute to bluesky-social/atproto development by creating an account on GitHub.

)

Oh, also, if y'all have liked what I've been working on, then you can support me at: [support.thisismissem.social](

Support Emelia Smith (@thisismissem)

Fund her work on the open social web, improving trust & safety, and making contributions to various other open-source projects

) [Support Emelia Smith (@thisism...](

Support Emelia Smith (@thisismissem)

Fund her work on the open social web, improving trust & safety, and making contributions to various other open-source projects

)

Ooooh, it works!! This is a client talking to an authorization server built with the `@atproto/oauth-provider` package standalone. I've implemented just enough to make this proof of concept work. https://puffball.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:5w4eqcxzw5jv5qfnmzxcakfy&cid=bafkreibhwdjt4l6wb6sm2ejvdvqvv2b3baz73avpz57fstmwy352dgcngm

So here's where I'm at with a custom "pds"-like thing that I'm building, where it's not actually using much of the PDS code from `@atproto/pds` but is actually just the OAuthProvider with a bare-bones implementation of the OAuthStore. (Sorry, I don't have subtitles) https://puffball.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:5w4eqcxzw5jv5qfnmzxcakfy&cid=bafkreifrkrqwubqadkflh5esqqn6a45x62e2x6bwbhklpfnobsyr6y5ri4

Hey #ATmosphere, someone is asking me about AT Protocol in PHP, specifically for being a PDS. Is anyone doing a PHP implementation? Is that even possible? #ATProtocol

Recently there has been a lot of dividing & heated discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol. Yesterday at the Social Web CG meeting, I proposed releasing a statement on this discourse, you can read the full statement here: [github.com/swicg/genera...](📃.md ) #activitypub #atprotocol #atproto #SocialWeb [github.com/swicg/general/...](📃.md )

Casual little pull request to fix support for multiple redirect URIs in the @atproto/oauth-client-node package: [github.com/bluesky-soci...](

GitHub

Fix #4136: Support multiple redirect URIs in @atproto/oauth-client by ThisIsMissEm · Pull Request #4139 · bluesky-social/atproto

Previously the callback method assumed a singular redirect_uris value, and enforced only performing the callback with the first registered redirect...

) [Fix #4136: Support multiple re...](

GitHub

Fix #4136: Support multiple redirect URIs in @atproto/oauth-client by ThisIsMissEm · Pull Request #4139 · bluesky-social/atproto

Previously the callback method assumed a singular redirect_uris value, and enforced only performing the callback with the first registered redirect...

)