My hot take that got me yelled at by ppl here was "doesn't seem 'leftist', extremely online but not getting NVE, not much evidence for groyper, doesn't read as cohesively strongly ideological in any direction, there's just not enough info, wait 48 hrs":
[www.kenklippenstein.com/p/exclusive-...](
The "free speech" ppl getting it wrong again.
AG Bondi: "There's free speech and then there's hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie...We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone w/hate speech."
via [@thebulwark.com](
)’s Status for a conversation about content and mobilization.
We discussed how real-world events become online spectacle, why influencers rush to set the narrative, who benefits (in some cases, profits), and what would change things.
[www.status.news/p/charlie-ki...](
This is not the first time that supposed “massive uk protest image” with the Arc de Triomphe has gone viral! Right wing influencers shared it earlier in September — Grok misidentified the photo as real in that case IIRC.
A factcheck from last time around: [leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2...](
IIRC all that labeling stuff was “censorship” & ‘Russian bots’ were a hoax perpetuated by Obama and the Stanford Internet Observatory.
The US senators & representatives calling for people to be fired for their political speech now —that is NOT censorship. The Freedom Caucus decides what words mean.
RE:
Michael Shellenberger, the “CBR Chair of Politics, Censorship, and Free Speech” at the University of Austin, has spent several years now trying to get academics whose speech he doesn’t like fired by lying about them…
These are lying hypocrites pursuing political power — not 1A champions.
RE:
