AI will not take your job. The person using AI will take your job.

Excited to be joining 21st capital

21st Capital

21st Capital

Secure Your Bitcoin with Expert Security, Analytics, and Sovereign Control Solutions.

Yo guys, proudly I announce I am the winner of a freaking cool pair of bitrefill socks (yes socks) after answering a quantum-bitcoin question during a Quantum and Bitcoin event organised by Bitcoinology. It was a pleasure to attend the session given by Tracy who is the UK country manager for Bitrefill and founder of Bitprocure, a company that helps people import goods from overseas, paid for with bitcoin. I enjoyed it a lot and learned that Xpubs should not be shared not only for privacy reasons but also for quantum security (are you using hardened and non hardened derivation path for your master key? )

Happy Sundays. Just had my beard and moustache wiped and hair done 😁🔥

In this video, I expose the uncomfortable truth: You’re not living — you’re serving. Slaving under fiat. Chasing status. Losing value. Calling it “normal.” But it’s not normal. It’s engineered. 🧨 Debt. Inflation. Consumerism. That’s the trap. 💡 Bitcoin is the exit. ▶️ Watch now to learn: 👉

The face of governors of central banks around the world waiting for the Bitcoin tsunami 😂

Why Owning ZERO Bitcoin Will Cost You Everything

Bitcoin Ordinals rely on a satoshi indexing system that pretends to assign unique identities to sats. But here’s the kicker: the whole system is built on arbitrary rules. Ordinals use a first-in-first-out model to trace sats—but why not last-in-first-out? Or any other ordering? All are equally valid. There's nothing objectively true about the "right" sat number. Some argue first-in-first-out is simpler. But that's just optics. first-in-first-out and last-in-first-out require the same number of computational steps to determine sat origin. Simplicity is symmetrical here. Even if you trace a sat back to the genesis block, your answer changes depending on the model you pick. So which one is "true"? At its core, Bitcoin is fungible. Inputs and outputs aren’t individually linked at the sat level. Assigning identity to individual sats is a social convention—not a protocol truth. Let’s not confuse clever labeling with objective reality. Sat numbering is arbitrary. Bitcoin’s base layer doesn’t care. Neither should you.

50% of the world problems are fixed with good money, but the rest is fixed with good economics. And most people don't even have a clue about economics