Good thread on some of the pain experienced by new Nostr devs, and also a good response of why things are the way they are. TLDR; Loose governance is not very meritocratic, and stronger governance is generally not either πŸ™ƒ Personally I’d love to see (maybe found?) a NIP consortium/collective/co-op some day, but I don’t think it’s time yet. View quoted note β†’
I had a great time at DWeb camp last week as always. I sat on an "Open Social Web" panel as the Nostr representative and I think what I had to say about Nostr was generally well-received alongside Bluesky and Mastodon. People were mostly drawn to the loose governance and the scrappy "good enough" approach to protocol design. But, like last year, it still feels like the energy folks have for "social media" as we typically think of it has been completely sucked out of the room. Few people are interested in putting more energy into some public virtue-signaling town square. I think Nostr has an advantage over Mastodon in Bluesky in this area because it really does have the most non-microblogging experiments going on, and the protocol is the friendliest to encrypted private spaces.
In the future all food will be made with a microwave, and if you can't deal with that then you need to get out of the kitchen.
In the Future All Food Will Be Cooked in a Microwave, and if You Can’t Deal With That Then You Need to Get Out of the Kitchen – Random Thoughts
I really feel like I'm missing something about Cashu. @calle calls it digital cash, but you are reliant on a bank (mint) to cash out. They say it works offline, but it doesn't really because it doesn't prevent double-spending offline. This makes it a glorified IOU tracker, right? Privacy-preserving IOU tracker is cool, and a network of banks that used them would be even cooler, but calling it offline digital cash seems totally disingenuous to me. Tell me why I'm wrong? View quoted note β†’