The most conviction I’ve ever had for anything in my life: buildbook’s ability to provide a decentralized network for technical people to share ideas, meet each other, and build stuff freely without censorship.
I don’t concern myself with the current development of LLMs or agents primarily because these are tools that must be utilized by the end user in some faction.
We allow them to do that by developing the network for technical people.
Buildbook.us
We don’t want people to run away from something to buildbook
We want people to run to buildbook for something
Buildbook is built on multiple protocols, we do not wish to own our entire stack.
I.e nostr integration
Buildbook will serve as a decentralized marketplace for developers who seek better internet experiences, while networking with each other to expand that goal.
A buildbook user can create an algorithm, publish it on buildbook, and have millions of people use it as an agent to dictate their X or YouTube algorithm(s).
When you get tired of that algorithm you can find another one posted by someone else, cycle repeats.
I will make Sequoia Capital invest with sats.
GitHub is a good code repo. It is not a good network.
This is a decentralized social network for technical people who wish to build software, a network, and a future for how corporations will decide to treat devs.
Not as disposable coders, but as people. If they wish to adopt AI for everything, that is fine. As long as they are ok with their newly laid off devs building their internal projects with others on buildbook with 0 retaliation.
The one problem with Primal is that it turns my phone into an F22 Raptor’s afterburner once I post a few times.
Software decentralization will increase every technical person’s dollar per output ratio
