That the middle classes congratulate themselves for displaying the Pride and Palestine flags even as they condemn ruffians who fly the national flag is incredibly revealing. It confirms national pride is the great unutterable emotion under the rule of the technocrats. Pride in the self is cheered – especially if you are in possession of one of the elites’ chosen identities, such as transgenderism, ‘queerness’ or minority status. Pride in one’s own puffed-up sense of virtue is cheered too, as demonstrated by the omnipresence of the Palestine flag on leafy campuses and in leafy suburbs. That flag is less a statement of solidarity with the Palestinian people than a statement of one’s own heightened moral sensitivities in comparison with the lower, less caring sections of society. […] The ringfencing of the flags of the elites, even as the national flags preferred by working people are roughly dispensed with, speaks to a new species of cultural supremacy. Convinced that their belief system is of a higher moral quality than that of the masses, they shield their icons from blasphemy while themselves blaspheming against the banners preferred by ‘ordinary people’. This is the cruelty of luxury beliefs: they would deny to others the thing they so jealously guard for themselves – a sense of pride and belonging, if only to cosmopolitan networks of elite opinion rather than anything as old-fashioned as a national territory.
The new naughty list just dropped, as the kids say these days. The pre-Christmas release of the Epstein files, or at least some of them – elves heavily redacted – has brought much-needed good cheer to all of us. Not every red face on Christmas afternoon will be down to port and brandy this year. And the cast of characters – Mick Jagger, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson, Richard Branson and all the rest – sounds like the guest list for the worst Graham Norton Christmas Special ever. […] the real eye-opener was Noam Chomsky posing genially for a snap with Steve Bannon. This determined radical leftist, the picture will lead many to believe, is more than happy to break bread with a white nationalist representing everything Chomsky loathes, so long as there’s a good party with pretty girls, a free ride on a private jet and a bit of Caribbean sunshine. (Chomsky has said, incidentally, that he valued Epstein’s intellectual brio, and I suppose we must take him at his word.) Elites, from the look of this, really do operate on the basis of nothing more complicated than the premise that we’re both rich so we should be friends! If a complete or even a relative stranger invited most of us on holiday, we would run a mile. I think this is true, though perhaps it’s a bit less true, even if private jets and Caribbean islands are involved. You’d just get the ick. Yet there they all are. And at no point, having befriended this guy whose only apparent attraction was his fortune (the origin of which, incidentally, remains unclear to this day), did they seem to wonder, these clever people, what was going on around them. Why, perhaps, the plane was nicknamed The Lolita Express. Why this man in late middle age seemed to have a disproportionate number of attractive teenage girls as friends. What, for that matter, the purpose of all this hospitality might be. I think it’s reasonable to imagine that at least some of them will have noticed that all this was a bit whiffy. And it’s reasonable to imagine, too, that they will have decided that it didn’t really matter, which leads us to point two. Namely, that the other thing the stupidly rich and famous have in common is a presumption that they can get away with things. https://archive.ph/2COF8
A decade ago, the UK government was worried about the rise of the Brotherhood in Egypt. Now, we see the Brotherhood rising to prominence in Sudan, parts of Yemen, Libya, Syria and most consequentially, Gaza. Hamas is the Palestinian offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood and it has used the terrorist attack of 7 October and Israel’s war in Gaza as a mobilising tool on Britain’s campuses and in its communities. What does the Brotherhood’s growing influence mean for Britain’s Muslims? It results in women facing sharia court trials for divorce proceedings. Mosques must send coaches to marches in London or risk becoming outcasts. For the rest of the country it has meant greater communal separatism and multiple terror attacks. Britain’s Jews are afraid to walk the streets of their country, and MPs have been attacked by Islamist extremists. The resulting terror threat has been classed by the government as ‘substantial’, with 43,000 individuals on an MI5 watch list just five years ago. The Jenkins report warned a decade ago about the threat from the Brotherhood to Britain’s national security. That menace has now metastasised. https://archive.ph/QhOUf
Went to see my mum for Christmas present delivery. It was nice to see blue sky for a bit.