It's good to see at least some challenges to the Anthropic claims that "AI-assisted attack was 90% autonomous".
- Unfortunately majority of media outlets are parroting these #cyberslop claims unchallenged.
The report by Anthropic makes some fantastical claims and conclusions based on those claims. In the end while the threats are there, theyβre mostly unrelated to AI or LLM use.
Pouring more money into AI companies isn't a magic solution. There's better use for this budget: Invest it in doing what you have been doing all along - Maintain good visibility and understanding of your environments and associated software solutions, patch your systems in a timely manner, perform periodic security assessments (internal or external), detect and respond to threats. AI or LLM are not magic and can't exploit vulnerabilities that are not there.

Ars Technica
Researchers question Anthropic claim that AI-assisted attack was 90% autonomous
The results of AI-assisted hacking aren't as impressive as many might have us believe.

