now supports , which is better than blurhash. You can see it in action on @npub1e49n...sm0m if your eyes are faster than your internet. (Or throttle the connection speed in your browser devtools network panel, this was a good idea.) Actually after browsing through a feed of blurhashes (on Jumble) and a feed of thumbhashes I've changed my mind, I think the difference is absurd and thumbhash is not only slightly better, it's astronomically better. @Cody would you add it to Jumble? @jb55 please jump in the bandwagon too! @Fabian? @Vitor Pamplona? @Cesar Dias? @YakiHonne?