A federal judge Thursday decried what he said were
âbreathtakingâ constitutional violations
by senior Trump administration officials
and called the president
an âauthoritarianâ who expects everyone in the executive branch to
âtoe the line absolutely.â
âŠIn remarks laced with outrage and disbelief,
U.S. District Judge #William #Young said Donald Trump and top officials have a
âfearful approachâ
to freedom of speech that would seek to
âexclude from participation everyone who doesnât agree with them.â
âŠYoung, who was appointed to the federal bench by President Ronald Reagan,
leveled the searing critique during a hearing in Boston to determine the appropriate remedies for the administrationâs â ď¸detentions of
pro-Palestinian students last year.
The judge had ruled in September that senior administration officials engaged in an đ illegal effort to arrest and deport noncitizen students based on their activism.âŠâŠOn Thursday, he again denounced the administrationâs conduct in unusually stark terms.
âTalking straight here,â he said.
âThe big problem in this case is that the cabinet secretaries
and ostensibly,
the president of the United States,
are not honoring the First Amendment.ââŠâŠHomeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem
and Secretary of State Marco Rubio
engaged in an
âunconstitutional conspiracyâ
to deprive people of their rights,
Young said.
âThe secretary of state,â he noted,
his voice full of incredulity,
âthe senior cabinet officer in our history involved in this.â
âŠSpokespersons for the White House,
Noem and Rubio did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Homeland Security, last year called Young a âcravenâ judge who was âsmearing and demonizing federal law enforcement.â
âŠThe government actions at the core of the case date to early March,
when the Trump administration launched a campaign to detain and deport noncitizen students at U.S. universities
who had been active in opposing Israelâs war in Gaza.
Though not accused of any crime,
those arrested spent weeks confined in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities,
at times hundreds of miles from where they lived,
before being released on bail.
âŠThe plaintiffs in the case are the American Association of University Professors
and the Middle East Studies Association.
The groups of scholars accused the administration of having an unconstitutional policy of deporting people based on their political views,
a policy intended to chill the free-speech rights of their members.âŠâŠThe trial last summer focused on the targeting of five noncitizen students and scholars: #Mahmoud #Khalil, #Yunseo #Chung and #Mohsen #Mahdawi, who were students at Columbia University;
#Rumeysa #Ozturk,
a graduate student at Tufts University;
and #Badar #Khan #Suri, a postdoctoral scholar at Georgetown University.
âŠAll were arrested except Chung,
who obtained a restraining order before ICE could find her.
The other four were released on the orders of federal judges,
but the Trump administration is still trying to deport them.
âď¸On Thursday, an appellate court in Philadelphia overturned a
Ruling lower-court ruling in Khalilâs case on jurisdictional grounds,
âď¸raising the possibility that he could be rearrested.âŠ
The president and other officials hailed last yearâs detentions as part of a fight against "antisemitism", alleging without presenting evidence that the targeted students promoted violence or were pro-Hamas.âŠ
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/01/15/protesters-trump-administration-free-speech-violations/