I swear “broken money” is going to give me aneurism one of these times.
We have to level up from the “breaking” rhetoric.
It’s not true.
I get why it’s tempting, seemingly helpful, but the reality is it mucks all our aces: ethics.
Those at the printer are gleeful when we use euphemisms that let them off the moral hook.
broken is a morally neutral term. which describes the relation between a means incapable of fulfilling its end.
moral terms like good and evil describe the relation between ends, the direction actions take us.
The monetary system doesn’t need repair, there is no fixing it.
It’s a means of control and extraction, and it works perfectly at achieving its ends.
The ends are wrong, contrary to natural law: evil.
That’s the grand slam. The only principle one needs to pick up to get the whole enchilada.
Our monetary system is aggressing upon you.
Formally, functionally enslaving you, your children, and the unborn.
It’s a fuxkikg combine harvesting your life.
It’s not a policy mistake, no one made an error and we are suffering unintended consequences.
We are experiencing oppression from our systems design.
yes, our system is going to run civilization head first off a cliff, and when that happens, there is no more money and no more civilization.
Bit when we say the money is broken, its like telling people we aren’t running.
I’m not surprised we are at 1% adoption when everyone needs btc.
we are selling people water in a desert, 1% is not an indictment of the product, but of our tactics and sales strategy.
The people aren’t stupid.
