Perhaps if you'd raised a stink about some of the previous nominations that you voted in favor of, the GOP wouldn't think that it was so easy to get across anyone they wanted... RE:
This is hilarious if you know the crew of folks who insist that Polymarket can never be wrong. RE: View quoted note →
For years I used to point to his "truckload of vegetables" descriptor of online arguments which was a handy tool. It's long since been deleted from the interwebs but it was showing how online arguments get stupid fast. I'll post a paraphrased version below but I find it especially ironic... RE:
Look, I know that Krogers is upset about the FTC blocking their Albertson's merger via antitrust laws, but it seems a bit extreme to ground up Judge Bork, whose views on antitrust... RE:
This is totally going to happen, isn't it? RE:
I'm way more optimistic about LLM tech than a lot of people around here, and find it *personally* incredibly useful. But I also find it takes a lot of work & careful thought to make it useful, and forcing people to use it guarantees it will be used very, very badly. RE:
Is there any newspaper who has failed the "don't print lies in the newspaper" test more than the NY Times? RE:
The other possible explanations I have are: 1. "everyone involved is pretty stupid" or 2. "there were never really any such files but Trump/Bondi played up that there were to keep rubes happy and now they're fucked" but... the "he's implicated" version keeps seeming more and more likely. RE: View quoted note →
OMG. RE: https://oyster.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:cak4klqoj3bqgk5rj6b4f5do&cid=bafkreieuhtf54r6slxzohcytj36aba7tozmdcojzgfz6ziqdasszlarusu
Yeah, it seems the issue is that there were some people who really *didn't* want Andrew Cuomo "touching" them, so maybe... work on that pitch a bit. RE: