By not coming out and saying it's because of tariffs, cowardly [@microsoft.com]( ) is allowing Trump to later claim that someone else paid for the tariffs. Just fucking say that it's because of the tariffs. RE: View quoted note β†’
Capitulating law firms suggested they had to capitulate to retain clients. The opposite may be true. RE:
We truly live in the dumbest of times, but watching Gerdes stumble and try to avoid admitting that he's a complete dumbass under questioning from [@jamestalarico.bsky.social]( ) is pretty impressive. The video leaves out Talarico later pointing out that this is "a manufactured, debunked smear campaign" RE:
Last year we ran a successful crowdfunding campaign to get our amazingly fun card game, One Billion users funded. The game is now going into production! YOU CAN STILL BACK IT. But for just for one more week. [www.kickstarter.com/projects/mma...](https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mmasnick/one-billion-users-the-social-media-card-game?ref=14nt84 ) RE: [One Billion Users: The Social ...](https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mmasnick/one-billion-users-the-social-media-card-game?ref=14nt84 )
I can hear [@kathryntewson.bsky.social]( ) screaming all the way from here as I read this. [theconversation.com/people-trust...]( ) [People trust legal advice gene...]( )
Also, looks like the Stringer Bell rule applies here. Apple execs kept taking notes on basically how their "compliance" with the injunction would thwart the clearly stated intent and purpose of the injunction. Then Apple tried to hide the notes. RE: View quoted note β†’
The level of pettiness is off the charts. RE:
The craziest thing in all of this, by the way, is that Apple *mostly* won this case. It was only one little bit that the court dinged them on, while giving them everything else they wanted on all the more important claims. That they still played games on the small bit they lost is just... stupid. RE: View quoted note β†’
πŸ‘€ RE: View quoted note β†’
"Cook chose poorly." RE: