Or, hear me out, the bill is an unconstitutional censorial mess that Trump himself has promised to abuse to take down content he doesn't like. Multiple experts offered to help you fix the bill and you ignored them all. This makes you a part of the problem. RE:
Bluesky Social
Amy Klobuchar (@amyklobuchar.com)
Good news to end the day: The House just passed my bipartisan TAKE IT DOWN Act and now it will be signed into law! This bill will provide victims o...
Hey @npub19pz8...yaz7, going to assume you have some thoughts about this executive order: [www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...](
The White House
Strengthening and Unleashing America's Law Enforcement to Pursue Criminals and Protect Innocent Citizens
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:Section 1.  Pu...
 ) [Strengthening and Unleashing A...](
The White House
Strengthening and Unleashing America's Law Enforcement to Pursue Criminals and Protect Innocent Citizens
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:Section 1.  Pu...
 )
Update on this. Apparently the bill just passed the House... 409-2. So, uh, yeah. A ton of Dems just gave the Trump FTC more power to censor the internet. Great job guys. RE:
Bluesky Social
Mike Masnick (@mmasnick.bsky.social)
Take It Down Act is a total censorial mess. And yet, a ton of "progressive" Dems are supporting it, even as it will enable the highly politicized a...
 View quoted note →
Had seen the news about [@thedispatchmedia.bsky.social](
Bluesky Social
The Dispatch (@thedispatchmedia.bsky.social)
Independent voices and reporting from the center-right. https://thedispatch.com/
 ) acquiring [@scotus-blog.bsky.social](
Bluesky Social
Bluesky
 ), but had missed this tidbit, which is extremely disappointing. Would hope The Dispatch would reconsider. Embracing open access to knowledge is important, especially for something like SCOTUSblog. https://oyster.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:cak4klqoj3bqgk5rj6b4f5do&cid=bafkreib2fl2rbtvvpwunwhgsdqtpgxyjziiuwszwbuycgbhabgbs6jfxby
Also, I compare how The Free Press covered the (misleading-to-false) story of the Biden admin "censoring" social media, to how they handled the (leaked directly to them) very real censorship attack on Wikipedia by Ed Martin. Spoiler: there are some differences. [www.techdirt.com/2025/04/28/g...](
Techdirt
Government Actually Threatens Wikipedia’s Editorial Freedom; Self-Proclaimed Free Speech Warriors Suddenly Have Other Plans
When Trump officials want to censor speech, they don’t quite say “we want to censor speech” (after all, they pretend to be the pa...
 ) [Government Actually Threatens ...](
Techdirt
Government Actually Threatens Wikipedia’s Editorial Freedom; Self-Proclaimed Free Speech Warriors Suddenly Have Other Plans
When Trump officials want to censor speech, they don’t quite say “we want to censor speech” (after all, they pretend to be the pa...
 )
Take It Down Act is a total censorial mess. And yet, a ton of "progressive" Dems are supporting it, even as it will enable the highly politicized and weaponized FTC to go after websites and demand content be removed from the internet. [www.techdirt.com/2025/04/28/c...](
Techdirt
Congress Moving Forward On Unconstitutional Take It Down Act
Here’s a puzzle: How do you write a law that’s so badly designed that (1) the people it’s meant to help oppose it, (2) the people...
 ) [Congress Moving Forward On Unc...](
Techdirt
Congress Moving Forward On Unconstitutional Take It Down Act
Here’s a puzzle: How do you write a law that’s so badly designed that (1) the people it’s meant to help oppose it, (2) the people...
 )
Katsas voting this way is big news... and very unexpected. RE:
Bluesky Social
Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social)
BREAKING: The D.C. Circuit, on a 2-1 vote, bars the CFPB from terminations pending appellate review of a district court injunction. Judge Pillard (...
Everything Radley said. Except he means "censorial" not "censorious." And, yes, this is the most pedantic hill I will die on. But, Brendan Carr, who Trump declared was a "free speech warrior" is the most anti-free speech FCC commissioner ever. RE:
Bluesky Social
Radley Balko (@radleybalko.bsky.social)
Hard to overstate what censorious bullshit this is. CBS would have 1A protection even if it had edited the interview in a "biased" way. But there w...
 View quoted note →
One more thought on this. Smith's piece notes that the chats he describes are almost all dudes, with just a few token non-dudes. Every active group chat I'm in is significantly more diverse, which likely plays a part in them not descending into adolescent stupidity. RE:
Bluesky Social
Mike Masnick (@mmasnick.bsky.social)
Yeah. I'm in a few too many group chats myself, and while I have seen memes show up in some, none of gone towards what Marc describes. The ones I'm...
 View quoted note →
Yeah. I'm in a few too many group chats myself, and while I have seen memes show up in some, none of gone towards what Marc describes. The ones I'm in that involve memes tend to focus on obscure in-jokes and such, not anything offensive. RE:
Bluesky Social
Carl T. Bergstrom (@carlbergstrom.com)
I'm in a number of very active group chats with prominent academics and politicians, and no one behaves this way. These dorks are so developmental...