Just for good measure we ended the week here in China with more “we are serious. Crypto is banned” news.
Doesn’t seem as though anyone cares anymore.
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/china-vows-tighten-virtual-currency-restrictions-2026-02-06/
Peter Alexander
Peter Alexander
npub1yy3u...kawc
China 30 year veteran
Joined Nostr at block 777177

I strongly recommend taking up YOGA.
It is the perfect anecdote to the chaos of the daily world.
And you men out there …. This message is directed especially in your direction.
China Morning Missive
“Begun, the Robot Wars have”
Forced technology transfers and an overreliance on China for intermediate inputs to final production. If there were ever to be an honest to God conversation in Washington over Chinese leverage it begins and ends with these two issues.
The issue of forced technology transfers would be easy to address if difficult to execute. To start, there was never all that much “force” applied. American corporations spent three decades willingly engaging with Chinese contractors and in that process IP was aggressively extracted. So, Chinese steal IP. Ok. To address the technology transfer and theft issues, you just stop making those transfers in the first place. This would, however, require management to accept a degree of impairment to both top and bottom-line results. Like I said, difficult to execute.
Addressing the issue of intermediate goods will take time and a great deal more commitment. In 2023, the latest data available, these inputs represented 47% of China’s total export value. Basically, China exports nearly as much finished goods as they do intermediate goods. China is no longer simply supplying final product to Walmart or Costco. China is now the primary supplier to a countless number of America manufactures. This issue, right here, lays at the core of last year’s rare earths episode.
And yet, for all the talk and posturing, it is very clear that there’s been no change in corporate behavior on either of these two fronts and there is no better example than that of Elon Musk’s Optimus robotics program.
Not that there is much need for confirmation, but reports are now surfacing that the Optimus production process will be reliant on “hundreds” of China suppliers. The rationale behind this decision is borderline delusional. Somehow, there’d be a market segmentation where America would lead in the robotic “brain” (software) and China would lead in the “body” (hardware). After this past year, with DeepSeek, QWEN, Kimi-K2.5 et al, it is beyond naive to even consider that China will be solely relegated to hardware. As for Musk, he simply knows that sourcing from America just isn’t an option, especially given his aggressive timeframe.
Over the past year I’ve been vocal in stating that the die is cast and that what China achieved with EVs will be fully replicated, and at tremendous speed, in the realm of humanoid robotics. It is already playing out when you consider the installation of industrial robotics. In 2024, China had total new installs of 295,000 versus America at 34,200. Worse, in the first nine months of last year, China’s new installs nearly doubled to 595,000 or 470 units per 10,000 workers.
Now that I think on it, the robot wars might already be over.


Interesting Engineering
Chinese parts challenge Optimus humanoid robot production goals in US
Elon Musk is exploring the possibility of manufacturing the Tesla Optimus entirely in the US while facing multiple challenges.
China Morning Missive
The essay!
All, as mentioned yesterday, spent the past month hammering out a doctorate-sized essay which details events from the past 30 years and how they - cumulatively - led to our current state of affairs.
The plan is to break the essay up into easier to digest installments the first of which you’ll find below. For those truly interested in how China successfully navigated a world run by a unipolar hegemon, you’ll enjoy and find value in what is presented.
Again, I welcome any comments, questions or areas of disagreement.
Am tagging @ODELL and @Marty Bent just for fun.
View quoted note →
This is a test. Seem to be having issues with relays.
China Morning Missive
China’s RMB ambitions
So, there seems to be a massive knee jerk, highly emotive, reaction across social media over the mere mention of China seeking to have the local currency (Renminbi, RMB) rise to the status of “reserve currency”.
The level of cope is on a whole new level.
For myself, it is all just the latest example of “post first and ask question later”. The comment has been taken completely out of context and yet it does very much align fully with how it is Beijing has been working to ameliorate the inherent risks imbedded in the USD system.
I’ve recently written a massive 18,000 word essay that addresses this very subject, the historical drivers and motivations, and I need to prioritize getting that essay uploaded here on Primal.
To the point, it isn’t the reserve currency where China is making inroads. It is, but it is slow. Where there’s been meaningful progress is in targeting the USD reserve asset. Gold settled trade is accelerating. As just one example, the ASEAN trading block has settled a full third of its trade with China in RMB and much of that has final settlement in gold.
Anyway, once I do get the entire essay up on Primal I’ll return and direct those interest were to find that tome of a document.
MSN
China Morning Missive
Speculative Folly
Yet another top Chinese general is purged, and, once again, the speculation is rampant. Claims are made and conclusions drawn and the attention quickly moves to what this will mean for the reign of Xi Jinping. There is talk of a coup. There is talk of a removal from office by “the Elders”. It is all a fugazi and, more importantly, a distraction from events underway that do matter, that do have significance.
In terms of the Xi rumors, this would make for the seventh or eighth episode (I’ve lost count honestly) of how events in Beijing are expected to bring down this “Emperor for Life”. And that doesn’t count all the rumors of ill health. Then again, all the speculation is to be expected in a world driven by social media engagement farming. There may be, possibly, importance connected to this latest development, but it has taken away from actual events from the past week that do have real-world implications.
Firstly, this past week provided an initial view into the strategic aims of China’s latest Five-Year plan. State Grid, China’s largest power transmitter and grid operator, announced a 40% increase in CAPX out to 2030. A commitment of Rmb4trillion (US$570billion). There’s been ample commentary of late of the massive gap between China’s ability to produce energy versus that of the United States. This announced investment demonstrates that energy, broadly speaking, will remain a top priority over the next five years and, with it, a further widening in the gap.
Then there was the announcement that the Shanghai Futures Exchange will begin trading LNG contracts denominated in RMB as soon as February. Beijing has spent the past decade making inroads into the adoption of RMB for pricing across the entire commodity complex. This move would indicate there now being greater willingness among counterparties to accept RMB payment terms. The Qataris would be the most obvious group given the construct of the current bilateral trade relationship. What will need to monitor is if Australian suppliers, delivering one-third of China’s LNG imports, will accept RMB as well.
The reason why Australia needs attention goes to another development from this past week. BHP announced that it would be accepting price concessions on iron ore exports to China after a lengthy period of stalled negotiations. And this deal comes just a few months after BHP agreed to accept 30% of iron ore purchases contracted in RMB.
Finally, there are the reports of the growing gold reserves held by Poland. How this connects with China goes to how it is the bilateral trade relationship is managed. Poland settles just over a third of its annual trade with China in RMB. It does run a trade deficit with China but taking into account the role played by the Shanghai International Gold Exchange in final settlement, it is reasonable to conclude that a portion of the rising gold reserves by Poland is attributed to RMB surpluses being net final-settled with gold.
These are the development that matter and is also a demonstration, once again, of China operating on a very low time preference. The most impactful events occur on the margins and are, almost always, overlooked and absent from geoeconomic analysis. It has always been a game of inches and will remain a game of inches.

Yahoo News
China’s top general is ousted as Xi ramps up crackdown
China’s top military general, Zhang Youxia, was ousted after reportedly being accused of leaking nuclear secrets to the US.
Fuck me. Just jumped on Twitter for the first time in two year. Had a look around…..
If that is a representation of America today, well, I’m calling it. GAME OVER.
Nothing but vitriol.
Zero empathy.
Zero introspection.