Watching the memepool not drop below 32 sats/vb for weeks. https://video.nostr.build/0a7ecec166e9323d0b4dab751c61f182a18aa4d859f7afa45d93cc21286f196e.mp4#m=video%2Fmp4&dim=580x314&blurhash=i6ATGz%3D%7D0Y%7ESSgJA%3FDeVjF07ny%7EkRk%24%24n-Itt6WEX2xTRR9cbW%250IqNtkC-.WFR.%25KIpM%7D-mxDWVwNs%3Ak8oeWVSKkCaPjc&x=032abbb87bf1f626bce1f839d35eb0627b0bda5ae0961783df89e0276ac3631e
Fuck around, find out. https://video.nostr.build/bbe00227083d17512bc1c5987455aa0eab06ee1fbf6e0f6ed85a5d5b568f216f.mp4#m=video%2Fmp4&dim=480x600&blurhash=_GGk%2Cu%7EA%25f8_IAbFoy0e4oa%24x%5D%25gjbWC9FtSi_t6oeoebG_2-%3AR*MyIUWBoL9a9Ff6x%5Ex%5DkCfk%3Fb-pWAROVsjYf6D%25NFofozozWXays.oLj%5DWBf*j%40W%3At8xuWBRje-o1oL&x=f1444138c02329767a8745fedd0594f312f01cda7297a6120674275d9b8579de #momsmad
https://video.nostr.build/80dee2a1d4a1c0b7e11852684af5594f1971c66fde108257f18bd762f42f1d49.mp4#m=video%2Fmp4&dim=480x852&blurhash=%5D5C67ME100W%3FV%40-qWBIUx%5DjE00%25L%7EX%251xa4--%3D%3FHDitR5QsDt6RjozNeDixt%3FIX8%7EXI.MxS4E0%3FH-%3BIU9ZITD%25NKxtoL%252&x=d86d9984612aa46989739394bf6230eab08d4454c0de2e027738315f6ba2f6e2
ะœะตะฝัŒัˆะต ะทะฝะฐะตัˆัŒ โ€“ ะบั€ะตะฟั‡ะต ัะฟะธัˆัŒ "The less you know, the more soundly you sleepโ€.
https://image.nostr.build/4ff9297bae1b615ce2d42936af3d1292a25a9ff0f1f929bca2c9d72005d01aa8.jpg#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1200x1598&blurhash=_BA%2C%25s%25M%7Eqjs%7EqWA%7EWtRkCkDogj%5BoffQ%3Fbj%5DWBofjsjsaextofofofWBayay_3bHofj%5BazfkWBRioKf6ayofayj%5D-%3BRjWBWCWCkCayxas%3AWBWBayayay%7Eqa%7CWBayRjayay&x=0983f44024047728e3f321c6806dade51fb549eec2fbd63415f48fd8b93a3baf
The โ‚ฟitcoin ETF approval was sent with a 2 sat/vb fee, so who onow how long we'll be waiting...
The SEC's use of "compromised" and "unauthorized tweet" implies an internal policy or procedural violation enabled the fake tweet, not an external hack. The agency seems to have chosen its words carefully to avoid clearly stating the account was hacked. This suggests the tweet resulted from internal misuse of credentials or mishandling of account access, whether accidental or intentional. The SEC stops short of saying its systems were breached externally, keeping open the possibility of insider responsibility. Their language hints some form of internal violation of account controls led to the unauthorized tweet being posted. #bitcoin https://image.nostr.build/75dc172e49735cb36b20f7ca6b0befd06ba2194f5864bd620a32296c3b182650.jpg#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1440x1003&blurhash=r36a%40t_4NH%25Nfi%25LMxMxIU%7Eqx%5Dxv%25NkCt6aeWBM%7B00RjxvogtRWCt7oMoeD%24slM_IUWXWXWCWCt7oIITITM_IURjazt7t84n9FMxM_V%3FWAoet7tR&x=e2ba3063d1c983b22f8a933b216a2ca406fe8e9b0a7b8d0e0ac3e66c1568ebd8
https://image.nostr.build/2ea16cfcadee7a8abdbb57e262ddd63ae45a0cd807b63330d6157f28aed3960a.jpg#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=768x768&blurhash=URI%23u%2CRj%25Mt7%7Eqt7RkRj%3Fbt7WBofM%7Bxu%25Mt7&x=45b3e14d6e51e8077191a0906289057e2cfa7e7a42a68e9ad2896f67b8038bea