Wild amount of petty friendly fire on here this week
The original headline in that NYT interview, blaming just "women" for ruining the workplace, is a much better reflection of its contexts, which include a riff on how men are "warriors" and women are "worriers." It's that infantile.
This week's [@unbreaking.org]( ) update on immigration is *also* an update on data security because the administration is using immigration enforcement as a way to trial and operationalize a full-on surveillance state. RE:
Authoritarian retaliatory everything everywhere all the time. We need these journalists so badly. RE:
Super fast work from [@jmetr22b.bsky.social]( ) at the Trib: [www.chicagotribune.com/2025/11/06/o...]( ) RE: [Chicago federal judge issues s...]( ) View quoted note →
Here it is, Judge Ellis's preliminary injunction in Chicago Headline Club v. Noem: RE:
Google is a mess but like…signed out, private window: 1. Wikipedia 2. AFL-CIO 3. Britannica 4. PBS 5. Debs Foundation 6. Marxists Internet Archive 7. the US Department of Labor RE:
Okay I read it (ty [@lshultz82.bsky.social]( )) and it is hair-raising at every level from the *cranked out researchers pretending to be UFO prophets* to the obvious interpretative malpractice, just breathtaking. RE:
I get homesick. RE:
Ohhhh a lot of the Newsom people on social were also the (incredibly unhinged) Cuomo in 2020 people, weren’t they