Thread

A lot of tone deaf lefties are desperately trying to get good people to hate them when Charlie was most likely killed by Israel. Govt ops only become more effective when people are disarmed & divided. The 2nd amendment is as necessary now as ever. Long range shooter, tagless getaway van, multiple decoys on the ground, Charlie recently said it's not necessary to blindly support everything Israel does (indicating a change in position), friend said Charlie was worried they'd kill him if he changed his position on Israel. Israel has lost the PR war, they stop a major influencer from adding to the strong chorus against them, they distract from their attacks on Qatar to further disrupt peace talks, & they distract from the Senate rejection of the release of the Epstein files. But is everyone continues to connect the dots, they only dig a deeper hole.
Dan Wedge's avatar Dan Wedge
A widowed wife, fatherless children. So much hate, so little love. A nation surprised by gun violence Again
View quoted note →

Replies (6)

On the topic of guns in society. Pro gun advocates say they are needed to protect against government tyranny BUT apparently no one was armed when the capital building was stormed; Nepalese gen z just ousted their government without needing everyone to be armed. Pro gun advocates say they are needed to protect against shootings like Charlie Kirk BUT he still got shot; when was the last time there was a similar shooting in a country with tighter gun laws like the UK or Australia? Pro gun advocates say the UK has high knife crime because they are not allowed to carry guns BUT you have to get much closer to someone to kill someone with a knife. No one is killing people in the UK from 200yards away. If Charlie Kirk had been killed with a knife there would be no question of who did it. Pro gun people, why are these arguments wrong? #asknostr