Thread

The funding rule of #[0] is that the code must be open source. It is to allow others to access the code, review the code, and distribute the code for free. But the Opensats board will not look at your project code or use your product. They don't use their own rules to review funding applications. They will only reject you based on a piece of GitHub statistical waste paper. This piece of waste paper does not belong to the funding rules. It doesn't matter even if you meet all the funding rules. They just want a piece of waste paper, not the built product and code. If you like, you can use artificially created beautiful green waste paper to get funding.
GitHub
GitHub - artiebits/fake-git-history: A command-line tool to generate GitHub and GitLab activity graph.
A command-line tool to generate GitHub and GitLab activity graph. - artiebits/fake-git-history
 It doesn't matter what features and code your product has built, and it doesn't matter what users like. You can get funding with a piece of statistical waste paper. This is not a proof of work for value exchange value, this is shitcoin behavior.
OpenSats
Apply to One of Opensats' Grant Programs
Global. Nym-friendly. Flexible.
 View quoted note →
image image image

Replies (1)

Dude, stop the bitching and put this energy into writing code people will use and care about. The design space for NOSTR is ENORMOUS and it doesn't seem like your thing adds much, if anything, new. Nobody needs ANOTHER social media client.