An asset underpinning a broken monetary system provides a very different view of #bitcoin than an open protocol emerging in layers.
This is what most people still pricing bitcoin in pieces of paper miss.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (14)
I see your perspective and I also can't pay my bills with magic Internet money just yet.
Lots of people are suffering and looking for a solution. If Bitcoin does not increase in purchasing power against pieces of paper it's not a solution.
It doesn’t need to increase in purchasing power AGAINST anything. The adoption is what unfolds it as a medium not the fiat gains. A lot of people came for the NgU but once the properties of bitcoin are understood it’s irrelevant. I can provide you a service and request a payment in sats that has no bearing to its “conversion” into fiat. Everyone’s numbers are different just like everyone charges different amounts for similar services. Just because you can’t pay for existing bills in bitcoin doesn’t mean those services couldn’t be provided by someone who allows bitcoin as medium of exchange. It’s just in the very early stages.
I'm sympathetic to your perspective and held the same one for a long time. I consistently have to check myself even now.
Those who are struggling, and I'd include myself in this, are not struggling because of a failure of Bitcoin, but because of personal finance. Spending less than you earn is the only place to start. Only then can you invest the difference in a new system that will measure deflation and reward a low time preference.
Bitcoin will always 'go up' when measured against pieces of paper over a long enough timescale.
In general ai agree, however when the barrier to sound finance (without significant lifestyle compromise) is raised every year there are smaller and smaller percentages of people who can maintain the balance.
Additionally in considering 60+ retirement age people there are 'fixed income' options, but all are risky and losing purchasing power from what I can see.
The future reality you are envisioning sounds nice.
I'll look forward to that happening one day.
Today a vast majority of what I need to live costs fiat.
You can pay for some bills using bitrefill or the bitcoin co.
Yes there are many work arounds, but the suppliers of a vast majority of goods and services are requesting fiat (for now).
That transition could happen faster than many anticipate.
I mean, that is fiat that you’d be giving them. Or are you referring to cash?
And this is exactly why I'm sympathetic to your viewpoint. I did a pod last year with Jeff and have written articles using the Titanic as an analogy for this very position.
You can recognise Bitcoin as the lifeboat, but if you're underwater on the bottom deck of the Titanic and you can't breathe, then a lifeboat won't save you in time.
That's why I'm a big believer in reading the likes of 'Rich Dad, Poor Dad' and 'The Richest man in Babylon' as a starting point. You've got to pay yourself first and save something (in bitcoin) for your future self. It's existential. You'll then start to see the polarity of the two systems, as one gets worse and the other gets better.
And clearly, fiat inflation will make life more and more difficult in this system, but Bitcoin will reflect this, literally like a mirror image. It has to.
Both paragraphs you've written are absolutely true. And it will get worse and worse. So the question should be which system are you going to give more of your energy to if you know this?
Honestly, I tread a horribly fine line in my day to day life and have witnessed it as a small business owner getting progressively more difficult for several years. But transferring what energy you can into Bitcoin, both literally and financially, is the only thing I believe you can do. I just see it as a priority, not as something to do at the end of the month.
I agree with everything you said there. I also wrote an article using Titanic as a metaphor. Personally, I put as much of my time and energy in the new system as possible. My whole life revolves around Bitcoin in most ways, which is great.
However I think telling people not to measure bitcoin in dollars is ignoring the current reality we are living in.
For example, if Bitcoin consistently lost fiat value year over year nobody would want to own it. It would have minor advantages over dollars (self custody/ censorship resistance ect), but I think NGU is fundamentally essential to bitcoin's success.
Claiming otherwise ignores economic reality. Maybe that's not Jeff's point or yours, but that's what I'm hearing when I hear someone way to stop measuring bitcoin in dollars.
They’re still counting worthless paper while we’re stacking sats, building layers of freedom, and watching fiat crumble #Bitcoin unstoppable
Thanks for your consistent reminders of this Jeff 🙏 that’s the only way to transform the fiat mindset we have known up until now
The debasement trade couldn’t be clearer. Pricing Bitcoin in paper units while ignoring the rot beneath them reveals the fracture.
Bitcoin isn’t an asset inside a broken system — it’s a rupture exposing the system itself. An open protocol emerging in layers doesn’t ask for belief, it demands understanding.
Until we teach the next generation what money actually is — not just how to count it — people will keep mistaking the signal for the noise.
and until the world realizes this, we have an asymmetric opportunity to provide stability to our future selves