Thread

Replies (38)

Not really. I like the idea of paying for old movies which I want my kids to watch but I can’t watch it on my TV so it’s just too difficult. I have tipped quite a few Wavlake musicians but that’s purely because I like it and at the time I felt generous. At other times I’ve felt poorer and less generous. I don’t really consider it paying for something more like I feel I need to support these guys cos I like their music. That’s too subject to my feelings.
My point is that nostr cannot rely on my charity. This isn’t a viable economic model. Nostr has to provide value and I’m willing to pay for that but I don’t cat pictures or photos valuable. If there’s an outstanding picture I’ll zap it but that’s far too subjective for a sustainable business. But having said that I do find @FLASH valuable so I do try and zap things I agree with. But that’s also so subjective ie I find it valuable and I zap. Someone else may still find it valuable but not zap. It’s difficult to make this sustainable. Nonetheless I’m willing to pay a lot for private AI @Maple AI so my point is that you cannot rely on people’s charity. You have to provide a service which someone finds valuable. And find some way of not giving it away for free. People will pay for something they find valuable but won’t pay for it if they can get it for free.
Absolutely Nostr’s real potential will only unlock when there’s meaningful economic activity flowing through it. Content creation, digital media, and all forms of value exchange need proper monetization. Micro-payments shouldn’t just be novelty zaps, they need to stack sats, incentivize creators, and build a sustainable on-chain economy. That’s how the network evolves from a social layer into a true financial layer .