Thread

Did you know that the Department of Veterans Affairs ran out of money during the government shutdown of 1995, and had to halt operations? In 2009 they lobbied for a law, which passed, that funds their budget *two years at a time* so that it's unlikely to happen again. The president at the time said this law “ensures that [this department] will no longer be held hostage to the annual budget battles in Washington.” source: So now, other government services are lobbying for the same exemption. For example, in 2019, Senator Merkley proposed doing the same thing for the Indian Health Service, and his bill (the Indian Programs Advance Appropriations Act) passed in 2022 after years of lobbying by Indian groups. Thus that service is also one of the “essential services” that may continue operations during a government shutdown. Basically, every government service has an incentive to lobby Congress to put them on the list of "essential services" so that government shutdowns don't affect them. And thus, nowadays, government shutdowns just don't do much.

Replies (3)

Yep There are several reasons why government shutdowns don't really do anything One is that the government somehow manages to spend more money *not* providing "non-essential services" than it spends *providing* them: But it occurred to me today that there's another reason: since government shutdowns happen with some regularity, all government programs have an incentive to get listed as an essential service. So I looked it up and found out that's exactly what they've been doing for years now, and thus each "shutdown" shuts down less and less of the government every time it happens.
Super Testnet's avatar Super Testnet
Someone told me a government shutdown means they stop providing non-essential services. So why don't we just "always" do that? Sounds like a huge cost savings! Turns out, they somehow manage to spend more money "not" providing those services than they spend "providing" them image
View quoted note →