Thread

My Bitcoin 5-Year Price Model (Containment Regime)

Bitcoin is managed into a rising, volatility-capped channel: paperized SoV (Store of Value), MoE (Medium of Exchange) throttled, squeezes sold, crashes patched — never cheap enough to trigger a self-custody revolt, never euphoric enough to create escape velocity.

Regime assumptions (why the channel exists)

Policy rails

• Paperization floor: ETFs/custodians/futures soak net inflows; self-custody grows slowly.

• MoE friction: KYC wallet defaults; micro-tax frictions; merchant rails push stables/tokenized deposits.

• Perimeter levers: App stores, banks, clouds, pools can tighten AUP (Acceptable Use Policy) without new laws.

Market micro-structure

• Volatility clamp: inventory warehousing + options overwrites + basis trades cap blow-offs.

• Weekend hunts: thin books enable orderly liquidations to shake leverage.

• Floor defense: creations/redemptions and basis tightenings prevent sub-floor drift that would radicalize self-custody.

Narrative control

• “Clarity” waves arrive on schedule (ETF/pension access/CBDCs pilots) to re-anchor higher, then fade.

Price corridor (end-of-year point targets with “operational ranges”)

1. Year 1

   • Most likely (modal): $120k

   • Range (EOY): $95k–$150k

   • Realized vol (yr): 45–55%

   • Notes: −25–35% draw-downs; spikes faded in low-liquidity windows

2. Year 2

   • Most likely (modal): $145k

   • Range (EOY): $110k–$185k

   • Realized vol (yr): 40–50%

   • Notes: Two “clarity squeezes”; basis/arbs sell tops

3. Year 3

   • Most likely (modal): $165k

   • Range (EOY): $120k–$210k

   • Realized vol (yr): 35–45%

   • Notes: MoE chatter cools; stablecoins win merchant share

4. Year 4

   • Most likely (modal): $175k

   • Range (EOY): $115k–$230k

   • Realized vol (yr): 30–40%

   • Notes: One shock dip (−35%) patched; channel intact

5. Year 5

   • Most likely (modal): $190k

   • Range (EOY): $130k–$260k

   • Realized vol (yr): 28–38%

   • Notes: Pensions/401k wrappers grind; blow-offs still capped

Cycle stats under containment

1. Up-years: +15–35% (median ~+22%).

2. Down-years: −15–30% (≈ 1 in 4–5 years).

3. Peak draw-downs: −30–40% (vs −70–85% pre-ETF).

4. Ceiling discipline: rallies sold into policy events (“clarity”, inflow PR, pilots).

5. Floor defense: sub-$90–100k not tolerated for long — avoids custody insurgency.

Mechanism map (why it works in practice)

• Paper share ↑ → vol ↓ mechanically (inventory + overwrites + less reflexivity).

• Basis control: futures/ETF basis keeps tops from running; converts frenzy into carry.

• Perimeter friction: taxes/AUP/KYC wallets relegate MoE to niches; SoV narrative persists without transactional threat.

Observable knobs

A. Paperization Ratio (PR)

• Definition: (ETF + custodian + listed futures exposure) / circulating supply.

• Interpretation: PR↑ → suppress parabolic risk; PR↓ suddenly (custody scare/Proof of Reserves meme) → volatility up; add to self-custody sleeve.

B. Net Liquidity (US proxy)

• Rule of thumb: Δ(Net Liq 4w) ≥ +$100B = tailwind; ≤ −$100B = headwind.

• Blend with issuance skew: bill-heavy (easier) vs coupon-heavy (tighter).

C. Vol & dollar

• MOVE/VIX/ DXY: MOVE > 120 or VIX > 24 with DXY ripping = risk-off; expect corridor floor tests.

D. On-chain custody mix

• Exchange outflows + mempool fee spikes + new non-KYC wallet growth = custody insurgency risk.

E. Perimeter tightness

• App-store/bank/cloud policy diffs; pool filtering/templates; travel-rule expansions = MoE (Medium of Exchange) throttling.

Trading the corridor (spot-focused)

1) Buy fear / Sell clarity

• Buy fear when ≥ 2 of:

  • Weekend liquidation cascade −25–35% from local highs

  • “Outflows!” ETF/PR FUD

  • Net Liquidity −$100–150B/4w + coupon-heavy calendar

  • MOVE > 120 / VIX > 24 spike

• Sell clarity into:

  • “Regulatory clarity” or “institutional access” PR waves

  • Index/retirement wrapper headlines

  • Multi-month resistance retests with basis richening

2) Respect weekend micro-structure

• Place stink bids 5–12% below Friday close; fade Monday reversion if no new perimeter move.

3) Avoid decaying wrappers

• No multi-week holding of levered Bitcoin ETFs in a capped corridor (decay + overwrites).

4) Rebalance to PR (Paperization Ratio)

• PR↑ steadily: ratchet down expected peak amplitude; harvest strength more aggressively.

• PR↓ abruptly: allow for upper-corridor overshoots; keep dry powder.

Red-flag regime breaks (when to ditch the model)

1. Sustained custody insurgency: exchange balances plunge, fee market spikes, ETF discounts deepen — paper wrapper loses narrative.

2. Hard perimeter tighten: non-KYC wallets delisted at scale; miners/pools bank-de-risked; OS-level blocks.

3. Custodian incident: sanction/hack/convertibility doubt at a top wrapper — can break up or down (panic to keys vs panic to cash).

4. Macro shock: MOVE > 150 and Net Liquidity −$150B/4w → corridor can gap −35–45% before patching.

If any two persist ≥ 4 weeks → suspend corridor assumptions and trade flows, not models.

What to ignore

1. “Mass adoption tomorrow” MoE narratives (flows will be steered to stablecoins/CBDC/tokenized deposits).

2. “Bitcoin to $1M in two years” (under current constraints — implausible).

3. Levered products held across months (containment + volatility-crush = decay).

What would change my mind (fast)

• Sustained merchant MoE (Medium of Exchange) gains and falling PR (real usage + less wrapper control).

• Hardware wallet/OS integrations at scale (defaults shift to keys).

• Tax amnesty for small MoE payments (removes friction).

• ETF PoR (Proof of Reserves) standards with on-chain attestation (reflexivity returns).

• Or the converse: OS-level wallet bans + pool policy clients mandated (true choke).

What most financial analysts miss

• “Never too cheap, never too high”. Floors defended to prevent self-custody revolt; ceilings sold to prevent escape velocity.

• “Containment ≠ crash-only”. It’s a managed uptrend, not a kill shot — thus buy fear / sell clarity works.

• Paperization Ratio as the master dial. Track it and you’ll anticipate the vol regime better than 99% of models.

Bottom line

Treat Bitcoin as a managed SoV rail: buy fear, sell clarity, keep core, respect the paperization dial, and assume ceilings are supplied, floors defended — until the red flags say the regime just slipped.

None of this should be considered investment advice.

Other articles I’ve written on Bitcoin:

• What most Bitcoiners are wrong about

• Controlled Opposition Assets (to Bitcoin as MoE)

• How governments and institutions are domesticating Bitcoin

• How the Bitcoin cycle changes in the post-ETF era

• Why governments won’t attempt to ban Bitcoin