Anyone who voted for this liar and hypocrite, I hope you hang your head in shame Keir Starmer's speech, delivered with a focus on fixing the "foundations" of the country, attempts to frame the current Labour government as inheriting a deeply troubled state of affairs, both economically and socially. However, this narrative warrants critical examination, especially in light of the role the Labour Party has played as the opposition in recent years. The Financial Narrative: A Convenient Surprise? Starmer highlights the discovery of a £22 billion shortfall in public finances as a startling revelation, positioning it as a challenge his government had not anticipated. This portrayal raises serious questions about either the competence or the honesty of the Labour leadership. As the official opposition, Labour had access to detailed briefings, economic forecasts, and financial data throughout the Conservative government's tenure. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the Bank of England, and various parliamentary committees provide information to ensure that the opposition can effectively scrutinise and challenge government policy. If Labour claims they were unaware of such a significant financial issue, it suggests a worrying level of incompetence. Any opposition party aspiring to govern must have a deep understanding of the country's fiscal state, as this knowledge is crucial for forming credible policies and holding the government to account. Labour's surprise at the financial situation implies either a lack of diligence in their role as opposition or a deliberate attempt to dramatise the situation for political gain. On the other hand, if Labour was aware of the fiscal realities but chose to present them as a shocking discovery, this raises ethical concerns. It would indicate a strategy aimed at manipulating public perception to blame the previous government entirely for the nation's financial woes, absolving themselves of any responsibility or prior knowledge. Such a tactic undermines the integrity of political discourse and risks misleading the public about the true state of the nation's finances
Imagine if you could dictate where every penny of your taxes are spent. I can't stop thinking about this concept. If you wish you could have 100% going to welfare or 100% going to national security or a mixture of whatever. Politicians would need to convince you where to send your taxes, with persuasion and hopefully honesty. They would be incentivised to educate the nation to the real issues and why the money needs to be spent there. I can't help thinking this will fix a lot of issues. An extra would be if taxes where paid with #bitcoin (not that I would ever part with my bitcoin) on an open ledger. You could verify it went to the correct places.