Oh the irony! Surely the concept of DEMOCRACY requires that a Prime Minister should be elected by the population? Even more ironic and certainly not democratic, is the parliamentary process/convention where mid-term changes of PM should at least be voted on by the elected political party's paying membership. And what do we have in the UK? A PM elected by fellow party MP's, bypassing the party's paying membership & the electorate. Totally democratic?
Furthermore, in a DEMOCRACY is it unreasonable to expect that the country's Foreign Secretary should be an MP elected by the population? Again not in the UK - David Cameron is not an MP as he was not elected as an MP in the last election.
Despite these small technicalities - David pushes for the seizure of a foreign state's asset for a war/dispute in which we are supposedly not directly involved. These funds should then be given to western nominated contractors to go in and rebuild/arm a foreign nation (in exchange for charges over the foreign nations land/natural resources??? - Economic Hitman)
https://twitter.com/kiraincong.../status/1733431416593973355
I guess, as they say FAFO! Carry on this playbook for too long and eventually you get found out...
https://archive.ph/k7vRb
Prepare according! #bitcoin
#HowMuchDidGreensillPayCameron #RegretOverPostOffice #GFY
