ANOTHER example of the REAL reason for removing the OP_RETURN 80-byte limit:
This is happening, folks.
Spam apologists say that this was all possible before V30, but the fact of the matter is, moving forward, we're going to see countless examples of the Ethereumization of Bitcoin.
Check out what the shitcoiners are planning to do on Bitcoin's main chain now that Core opened the floodgates for spam:
X (formerly Twitter)
DΓ©tectives Tokens (@DetectiveToken) on X
Remember the first BRC-20 hype wave ignited by $ORDI back in the day?
Get ready, because itβs coming back even stronger this time.
With the OP_R...
"Remember the first BRC-20 hype wave ignited by $ORDI back in the day?
Get ready, because itβs coming back even stronger this time.
With the OP_RETURN upgrade, weβre finally seeing the mechanism Vitalik Buterin once dreamed of: enabling secure liquidity pools, decentralized trading, yield farming, and passive income directly on Bitcoin Layer 1.
That vision is about to become reality.
$LOL and $WTF are leading this revolution, and you can position yourself early now on
@theblacknode
.
The true era of Bitcoin DeFi is here, bringing unprecedented rewards.
The opportunity is about to begin."
And for those just arriving at the party, the original post is about another example -- --->
Stacker News
The REAL reason for removing the OP_RETURN 80-byte limit \ stacker news ~bitcoin
Did you ever wonder why the Bitcoin Core developers were willing to risk their reputation and the software's status as the reference implementation...
BONUS: The linked tweet references a 2017 message by Vitalik about limiting OP_RETURN to 40 Bites. Under it, there's the funniest answer by no other than Shibobi:
""Like....people didn't want me building this super spammy world computer on their store of value....why are they so mean to me!?!?!?" Deal with it, even fucking Satoshi saw this coming, you don't cram everything onto one chain/network:"
This is what that man thought before Bitcoin Magazine employed him.
