This is a great point and I've postured similar thoughts in a post a few days ago. I don't think exclusivity is intentional these days but there's a real microcosm of ideologies that challenge wider adoption. Both technical and content-based. View quoted note β†’ View quoted note β†’
working from home today but I still put on a Christmas jumper. dwi πŸ˜ΈπŸŽ„ (yes, I'm aware there's a cat hair on my jumper, you're lucky you only see one... πŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ± ) image
Quick overview of the various #nostr chat #NIP specs: NIP-4: old DMs (deprecated) NIP-44: new DMs NIP-44 + NIP-59: new DMs with Gift Wrap image It's very clear what the way forward is, however it's down to universal robust implementation from the various clients and usage of personal relays (or at least trusted ones where you can delete).
Hey @utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’» I'm not sure if you're the right person to ask, but does #haven delete NIP-17 DMs? I see that deletion support was added in 1.0.0 for the inbox relays, and from my DM tests it seems that DMs were deleted, but I am having trouble confirming that or finding documented reference of it. Thank you so much! πŸ™ View quoted note β†’
what are the best #NIP-17 compatible relays to host ourselves right now? Including deletion support. I'd be happy to host one for public use too, but not sure which is the most advanced for DM capabilities. View quoted note β†’