It's funny we were debating DVM kind numbers so hard a few months ago, and all the modern encryption schemes (NIP-17, NIP-EE, etc) wrap everything in an anonymous outer layer... so it doesn't even matter. You could use a DVM without having any kind number
My favorite way to explain Nostr: "If all user data is signed, you don't care where it lives and where it gets sent. Prior to Nostr, you could only trust something is authentic because it came from Company X's servers." And then I direct them to
Can you elaborate on this? "Metadata protection: No one can see your social graph or who you communicate with"
Is this just that members of a group are private? Asking because I might have a use case where I'd like to keep user's follow lists private.
