These approaches sustain the protocol's antifragility, with node growth correlating to healthier adoption (global ~3%). Hierarchs' exclusivity narratives falter against such grassroots efforts, preserving Bitcoin's core as a permissionless transport system.

Okay, the user presents a dense, almost poetic critique: "Nothing illustrates the insanity of failed solutions as the repeatedly futile efforts to solve the edge by filtering the core." Hmm, this feels like a systems-thinking proverb. Let me unpack the metaphor layer by layer. First, the core vs. edge dichotomy. In any system—be it tech, policy, or biology—the core represents foundational principles or infrastructure, while the edge is where interactions happen. Think internet (core protocols vs. edge devices) or society (laws vs. individual behavior). The user's frustration centers on "filtering the core to solve edge problems." Ah, that's brilliant. It's like adding more centralized bureaucracy to fix frontline service failures, or bloating an app's backend to handle UI glitches. Classic misalignment. The insanity? Doing this repeatedly while expecting different results. I wonder if they're drawing from personal experience. Maybe a DevOps engineer tired of patching servers for user error? Or a policymaker seeing regulations misfire? The word "insanity" suggests visceral frustration with institutional blindness. Structurally, we should dissect: (1) Why core-focused solutions fail for edge issues (scale differences, emergent behaviors) (2) Why we keep falling for this (control illusion, core being easier to modify) (3) Alternatives (edge autonomy, feedback loops). The philosophical angle matters too. This mirrors Taoist wu-wei—forcing vs. flowing. Or Chesterton's fence principle. Must emphasize that edges aren't "problems" but innovation zones. Caution: Avoid tech jargon since their field's unclear. Anchor examples in everyday life like traffic management (core=road design vs. edge=driver apps). Their tone demands intellectual rigor but also catharsis—acknowledge the madness before offering hope.

Charming View quoted note → Explains https://following.space/d/vsgjg83h2idk

We respect your privacy We use cookies and other technologies to operate our website(s), improve usability and personalize your experience. To learn more about how we collect and protect your data, visit the Loblaw Privacy Policy

"Bitcoin is not a debt receipt: It is a pure asset with clear monetary utility. Moreover, it is historically unprecedented as a technology that offers virtually no potential utility towards violent ends whatsoever, and yet high defensibility against violence. These form an intellectual foundation for a radical reimagining of the monetary weave of the social fabric." (from "Bitcoin Is Venice: Essays on the Past and Future of Capitalism" by "Allen Farrington, Sacha Meyers, Alex Gladstein"). Start reading it for free: https://a.co/hcveYIU.

The Angel of Death stands between heaven and earth, holding a poison-dripping sword. Identified with Satan, he is full of eyes, a diligent reaper, an old fugitive and wanderer like Cain, a beggar, a pedlar, an Arab nomad, a skeleton capering with sinners and misers in a juggler's dance But the nightmarish Angel presents a different face to the one who has 'died before death', or who has attained some measure of the apatheia of the saint. We are told that Azrael, Death, appears to our spirit in a form determined by our beliefs, actions, and dispositions during life. He may even manifest invisibly, 'so that a man may die of a rose in aromatic pain' – or of a rotting stench When the soul sees Azrael, it 'falls in love', and its gaze is thus withdrawn from the body as if by a seduction. Great prophets and saints have even been politely invited by Death, who appears to them in corporeal form. Thus it was with Moses, and with Mohammed. When the Persian poet Rumi lay on his deathbed, Azrael appeared as a beautiful youth and said, "I am come by divine command to enquire what commission the Master may have to entrust in me." In fact, a strange connection becomes apparent between Mors and Amor, Love and Death. The moment of 'extinction' in the pleasure of love resembles that of death, and thus that of the mystic. In mythic terms, Eros and Thanatos are almost twins, for in some cases Death appears as a lovely youth, and Eros as a withered starveling Both Love and Death are gateways, hence their eternal adolescence and their fixation in the midst of the rite of passage

5,000 NZD Cap on International Transfers Hitting New Zealand Amid Anti-Money Laundering Efforts The futility enlarges.

Bitcoin is the Benchmark: Why the Biggest Opportunity in the Next Decade isn’t DeFi ***Excerpt from the July Issue of The Bitcoin Capitalist – ‘The Stablecoin Standard’

Bitcoin is the Benchmark: Why the Biggest Opportunity in the Next Decade isn’t DeFi – Mark E. Jeftovic is The Bombthrower

"The immutable smart contracts at issue in this appeal are not property because they are not capable of being owned," Judge Don R. Willett wrote. https://www.axios.com/2024/11/27/tornado-cash-sanctions-reversed

Eugippius (circa 460 – circa 535, Castellum Lucullanum) was a disciple and the biographer of Saint Severinus of Noricum.