Puerto Rico may roll back transparency just when it matters the most
When the U.S. Navy quietly reactivated Roosevelt Roads Naval Station in Puerto Rico earlier this year, the move stirred both anxiety and hope. While some residents saw the promise of new jobs, others saw it as a painful reminder of past harms from the American military presence on the island.
Whatever their views, Puerto Ricans — and Americans everywhere — deserve basic answers about what the military is up to as tensions escalate with Venezuela. They should know whether Puerto Rico’s government is coordinating with the Pentagon and whether their concerns are being taken into account. And of course, there are countless local issues having nothing to do with international conflicts that Puerto Ricans are entitled to be informed about.
But at the very moment when transparency is most essential, Puerto Rican lawmakers are trying to slam the door shut. Senate Bill 63, a major rewrite of the island’s transparency law, was recently rushed through the legislature with little public input. It weakens the public’s right to know at every turn.
SB 63 would undermine transparency
Puerto Rico’s existing transparency law, passed in 2019, already faces serious problems. Recently, for instance, the American Civil Liberties Union of Puerto Rico sued to uncover records about how the territory’s transportation agency shared confidential driver’s license information with federal immigration officials, which may have violated local laws.
SB 63 would make it even harder for the public to know what government officials are doing. The bill significantly extends the deadline for responding to records requests, more than doubling it in some cases. For time-sensitive investigations, especially by journalists, these delays could bury relevant information or make it irrelevant or obsolete, crippling efforts to expose the truth.
This bill will also make it harder for the public to understand the information they do receive. Today, requesters can ask for information in easy-to-analyze formats, like statistics or spreadsheets. SB 63 would eliminate that right, making it harder to find specific information that’s of the most use to the public.
In addition, SB 63 would require agency heads to be alerted to every single records request. This change injects politics into what should be a straightforward process. At the federal level, both Democrats and Republicans have used similar review systems to conceal politically inconvenient information.
What’s more, SB 63 would also require agencies to withhold records that any judge has previously deemed confidential, even if that ruling came from a single lower court and was never reviewed or affirmed. But judges get things wrong all the time — that’s why their rulings are not precedential and are subject to appellate review. Under SB 63, a single questionable decision from a single judge could lock in secrecy indefinitely.
SB 63 would leave Puerto Ricans and all Americans less informed
Puerto Rican lawmakers seem to know SB 63 would be unpopular. The Senate approved it without a public hearing, and the House allowed just one day of testimony, during which many entities were shut out. It’s not an accident that an anti-transparency bill was pushed through with as little transparency as possible.
The timing couldn’t be worse — and not only because Puerto Rico seems to be one of the main platforms for U.S.-projected interventions in Venezuela. As Puerto Rico faces deep challenges in housing, education, and climate, reducing access to information will only exacerbate existing problems.
The need for local transparency is heightened exponentially by Puerto Rico’s colonialism. Public records are essential for understanding issues such as failures in hurricane relief by federal and local authorities, collaboration between local agencies and federal immigration officials, and the impact of federal policies on the territory’s schools and colleges.
In addition, cuts to federal Freedom of Information Act offices are already making it harder for Puerto Ricans to obtain information from Washington. If local transparency is also weakened, oversight and accountability will become virtually nonexistent.
Fortunately, Puerto Ricans refuse to be silent. More than 50 civil society organizations, along with community and academic leaders, have urged Gov. Jenniffer González Colón to veto SB 63 because the legislation is bad for Puerto Rico’s citizens, businesses, and democracy itself.
Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) also joined other press freedom organizations in a letter led by the Committee to Protect Journalists, calling on her to reject the bill.
Puerto Rico can’t afford to be left in the dark. SB 63 dims the light of transparency precisely when we need it the most. Gov. González should reject SB 63 and stand unequivocally with the people’s right to know.
freedom.press/issues/puerto-ri…
Further PPI GA Information
Dear All Members of Pirate Parties International and all interested parties,
The 2025-2026 PPI Winter GA will take place on Saturday, January 10th, 2026, starting at 09:00 UTC.
The event will be hybrid with some participants physically attending in Potsdam, Germany.
If representatives from your organization intend to participate in person, please let us know by
requesting a completely free ticket here: eventbrite.com/e/1975346809482
Discussion about the GA is currently on Discourse: ga.pp-international.net/
Further information is also available on our Wiki:
wiki.pp-international.net/wiki…
The meeting will take place on the PPI Board Jitsi Channel: jitsi.pirati.cz/PPI-Board
If we have connection problems we will revert to our Mumble:
wiki.pp-international.net/wiki…
If you have any statute amendments or new member applications, please make sure that you send
them to the board by December 10th. If you have any other motions or any other business, feel
free to bring them up before the meeting, and you are free to propose them at the meeting itself.
It is very important that we make a quorum, so please delegate your vote to another member if
you cannot come to the event. Please also forward this message to other PPI members.
Delegates should be announced to the board prior to the start of the GA. Each member may have
up to 6 delegates. Others are welcome to attend without voting. Rules of the GA can be reviewed
on the Wiki: wiki.pp-international.net/wiki…
We also remind full members to pay membership fees. We don’t want anyone not to participate if
they don’t have funds to pay membership fees, so please let us know if you require a discount or
accommodation. Please note that nascent members have no membership fees.
We hope that many of you can attend, either in person or online.
Good luck to us on having a successful event!
Thank you for your assistance,
The Board of PPI
pp-international.net/2025/12/f…
