archive here https://archive.ph/LaWBD#selection-3393.0-3409.219 Writing in his 312-page ruling, issued on Monday, Mr Kemp cited other legal cases to support his conclusion that it did not contradict the Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year on the definition of a woman for the purposes of the Equality Act. However, the ruling was reissued on Thursday afternoon after it emerged that a quote he attributed to a tribunal involving Maya Forstater did not appear in that case’s judgment. This prompted Ms Forstater, the chief executive of the sex rights charity Sex Matters, to tweet: “This ‘quote’ from my judgment doesn’t come from my judgment. It is completely made up.” The tribunal issued a “certificate of correction” stating there had been “clerical mistake(s), error(s) or omissions(s)”. The Judicial Office refused to say where the original quote came from or whether AI was involved. View quoted note →