Airplanes are PEAK TOXIC environment. Below readings were taken by Eric Windheim while flying on Boeing 747 MAX8 using an oscilloscope plugged into the airplane's power socket. Look at the massive levels of Dirty Electricity (high-frequency voltage transients) riding on the aircraft’s power system, with harmonics reaching beyond 90 KHz This isn’t just MINOR ELECTRICAL NOISE. The waveforms show intense modulation patterns, likely caused by switch-mode power supplies (SMPS), Inverters, LED lighting & onboard WiFi systems. All this in ADDITION to EMFs from RADAR, avionics, in-flight Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, passenger devices. No wonder people feel so drained after flying. But the problem goes deeper than just the readings. What makes this reading even more concerning is the physical environment of the aircraft itself. An airplane is essentially a hollow aluminum tube, a conductive enclosure. In Physics, this acts as a Faraday Cage. It blocks signals from getting in, but it also traps signals inside. With 200+ people using cellphones & Bluetooth, plus the plane's industrial WiFi, the radiation has nowhere to go. It just bounces off the walls and zaps you from every angle. Another thing most people don't realize that aircraft electrical systems don't run on the standard 50/60Hz grid we use on the ground. They run on 400 Hz to save weight on parts. This higher frequency baseline is already more biologically active than ground current. Add in those dirty spikes from the readings above and you have a chaotic electrical soup. So If you plug your laptop or cellphone into the seat, you are physically connecting yourself to that Dirty electricity. You have been warned.

Wireless RF Radiation at levels 136x times less than safe ecommended limits by FCC is as toxic as caffeine at 290x the safe dose. PMID: 31416578

If you want to understand the Human Body Study Biophysics & Quantum Biology. If you want to understand Human Nature Study Bitcoin.

8k on NOSTR is like 80k on X 800k on Instagram. Grateful 🫡

🚨New Study on nnEMFs🚨 A 5 year study from India found that keeping mobile phones in pockets & keeping laptops on laps for long hours significantly increases the risk of male infertility and even IMPOTENCE Published : 06 August 2025

Your WiFi router doesn’t sleep That’s why you should turn it off.

View quoted note →

You’d never put a cell tower in your baby’s room… but what if you already did? …a wireless baby monitor placed at 1 meter from the crib can expose the baby to the SAME LEVEL of RF radiation as if there were a cell tower 50–100 meters away..

I’ve never seen electromagnetic fields described in a way that makes more sense

All non-native non-ionising man-made EMF i.e. - Microwave frequency - Radio frequency - Dirty electricity - AC Magnetic - AC Electric - Blue light - Flicker irrespective of their frequency cause harm below our level of perception through mechanisms other than the thermal effects which everyone keeps referring to when they say "it doesn't have enough energy" The key here is to understand that the mechanism of damage with non-ionising radiation is different from the ionising radiations. via mechanisms like calcium efflux, intracellular dehydration and increased permeability of the BBB. Allan Frey in 1960s figured out the link between weakening of Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) & EMF exposure allowing toxins to enter the brain Perhaps the next question we should ask is If the blood-brain barrier is vulnerable to serious and on-going damage from wireless exposures, then what about The blood-ocular barrier (that protects the eyes) The blood-placenta barrier (that protects the developing fetus) The blood-gut barrier (which ensures proper digestion and nutrition) The blood-testes barrier (that protects developing sperm) to see if they too can be damaged by these wireless radiations? and if you read report from 29 independent scientists & health experts from around the world who put down an indepth report called "The Bioinitiative Report 2012" with over 1800+ studies showing bioeffects and adverse health effects of EMF from wires (powerlines, electrical wiring, appliances and hand-held devices) and wireless EMF (cell and cordless phones, cell towers, WI-FI, wireless laptops, wireless routers, baby monitors, surveillance systems, wireless utility meters smart meters, etc.) When you look at the data, You will quickly see that when telecom industry funds EMF research ↪ 68% of research showed no effects ↪ Only 32% showed harmful effects When there was no money from the wireless industry ↪ 70% of studies showed harm ↪ 30% showed no effects And that funding bias is not a coincidence, it is how they play this game. If you want to control the narrative, you do not need to control the physics You just need to control the studies people hear about. Telecom companies will proudly say “Look, most studies show no harm” while quietly forgetting to mention that they paid for a big chunk of the “no harm” pile. Now zoom out for a moment We already know: - The mechanism of injury for non ionising EMF is not about breaking DNA directly like X rays or gamma rays - It is about disrupting biology - Messing with signalling - Messing with voltage gated calcium channels - Messing with membranes and water structure - Messing with barriers that are supposed to stay tightly sealed Once you accept that the thermal argument is outdated you suddenly see why so many different systems can be affected Sleep Mood Fertility Cardiovascular system Blood sugar control Neurodegeneration They are all deeply electrical and deeply dependent on timing and membrane integrity. Now come back to those barriers If EMF can weaken the blood brain barrier Why would we assume the blood ocular barrier is magically immune when the eye is basically an exposed extension of the brain Why would we assume the blood testes barrier is perfectly safe when sperm development is already known to be extremely heat and stress sensitive Why would we assume the blood placenta barrier is untouchable when it sits between a rapidly developing nervous system and a world full of signals we never evolved with We have built a civilization that is basically soaking every barrier in chronic fields and then acting surprised when we see - Exploding infertility rates - Earlier and earlier vision problems in kids - Neurodevelopmental disorders - Gut issues and “mystery” inflammation everywhere Instead of asking “What tiny narrow outcome does this one short study show under these carefully controlled artificial conditions” We should be asking What happens when you stack - A cell tower 50 meters away - WiFi in every room - Bluetooth in your ears - A phone in your pocket - Smart meter on the wall - Dirty electricity on the wiring - LED & screen blue light in your eyes till midnight Every single day for decades starting in the womb. That is the real experiment And NONE of us consented to it. View quoted note →