ici j’emploie la « signalisation de la vertu » en disant que c’est un excellent livre. Ne soyez pas un NPC, lisez-le ! Un beau détour académique qui contextualise le conformisme. des leçons très importantes pour mes compatriotes sur Nostr

Here’s me injecting Section 230 analysis into the debate on Bitcoin node implementations, OP_RETURN, and the notion of blockchain spam and liability The wonders of Section 230 protect much more than just social media platforms — it’s all of technology!

Protos

EXCLUSIVE: Lawyers call Bitcoin Core v30 CSAM concerns ‘overblown’

Bitcoin Knots supporters have argued that a change to an upcoming release of Bitcoin Core could open node operators up to legal attacks.

Too many Bitcoiners in the OP_RETURN and node filtering debates have never heard of Section 230 and it shows

Proßt von Oktoberfest!

January 2012, Season 3, Episode 13 of The Good Wife, first TV series mention of Bitcoin

a classic

The size and scope of the state has grown so gargantuan that it burrows itself permanently into the private sphere and we're left with the politicization of absolutely everything and where might makes right. And it swings chaotically like a pendulum between political regimes

So let me get this straight: whether I not I choose to do this will somehow assign my loyalty in the "Filter Block Wars of 2025"?

Sometimes I do get cleaned up for TV

Elected politicians calling around to private businesses and organizations to get people fired is beyond the pale for a free society Social media mobs are one thing. But using your perch of power to dictate behavior in the private market is an illiberal abuse of authority.