>BREAKING: Israel Attacks HAMAS, Why This is Different /Lt Col Daniel Davis & Jennifer Kavanagh
>The discussion highlights the significance of Israel striking Qatar—a U.S. partner uninvolved in the conflict—which marks a serious escalation beyond Israel’s usual claims of “self-defense.” This could shift European and regional attitudes, though much depends on whether resistance to sanctions is rooted in substance or politics.
>The U.S. is uniquely positioned to influence Israel because of its military and diplomatic support, but Washington’s unwillingness to act strongly creates the perception of impunity. Israel’s leadership, instead of downplaying the strike, openly broadcast it as a warning to the region, which risks galvanizing opposition, especially from countries like Jordan, Egypt, and Turkey.
>Analysts stress how abnormal it is for one state to attack multiple neighbors and note that this could spur a balancing coalition. The act undermines U.S. diplomacy—particularly as the strike occurred during ceasefire talks tied to an American proposal—and weakens trust in Washington as a credible negotiator, including with Russia over Ukraine.
>The broader concern is that this reflects a collapse of the so-called “rules-based order,” exposing it as selective—applied to rivals like Russia and China but ignored for U.S. allies. With Washington showing open disregard for international law, more countries in the Global South may look to alternative poles of power, such as BRICS or China’s governance model, which appear more stable. The result is a world sliding further into raw power politics, eroding U.S. influence and credibility.
