# About the Submission of Wives to Their Husbands
We are all, in some way or another, in rebellion against God, and then it is not about judging women for their own rebellion but about trying to understand why and how they can change if they want to.
Let us start by saying that submission is something that one does voluntarily and that it couldn't be in any other way because men and women were created equally and our Father has no preference for men over women nor women over men, and since we all have free will, it is up to us whether we submit to someone or not.
Jesus Christ gave us the most astonishing example. When Jesus was twelve, his parents took him to Jerusalem for a holiday. On the way home, they realized he was missing and went back to look for him. After three days of searching, they found Jesus in the Temple sitting with the teachers. Everyone was amazed at how smart he was. Mary was upset and asked, "Why did you do this? We were so worried!" Jesus answered, "Why were you looking for me? Didn't you know I had to be in my Father's house?" Mary didn't understand what he meant. Jesus went back home with them and obeyed them.
Why would Jesus Christ, God himself, obey Mary and Joseph? Jesus voluntarily obeyed his parents because that's the natural law, God's law, and he doesn't break his own law. Children must obey their parents because nobody will love them and take care of them as their parents do. We all have obeyed our parents even when we weren't able to understand why they asked us to do or not to do something, and that's okay because parents love their children much more than children love their parents. In that sense, the family replicates in this world the same structure where our Father loves us more than we love him. Moreover, just as children somehow know that obeying is the natural thing to do, they don't always want to do it.
Submitting to God, our loving Father who wants the best for all of us and who sent his son to suffer and die for us, should simply be natural, but we fail to do it miserably again and again. The same happens with our sisters. If you met a good man, one that you are in love with, someone who loves you and wanted to marry you and form a family with you and make you happy, shouldn't it be natural to submit to him? I mean, all men know that women have virtues and vices different from theirs and they all know that women have been given what they don't have. However, many women believe they are like men and that men haven't received anything special, so why would a woman submit to her husband? But the reality is that leadership is more natural in men and submission to their husbands is also natural in women. In the same way that wives feel unhappy when their husbands refuse to lead, men feel unhappy when their wives don't follow them.
There is also a lack of trust. What if I submit to my husband and he loses his path? Or he becomes irresponsible or leads the family to ruin? What if he becomes a bad model for my children?
In the same way that you submitted voluntarily because you trusted him, once it is clear that you can no longer trust him anymore, you don't have to submit to him anymore in order to save your household. That's what Abigail's story is about, and God sees it as good, just as he sees your submission to your husband as good when he is a good man.
A husband who loves his wife would naturally pursue her happiness, and a wife who loves her husband would naturally submit to him. But how? Let us start by helping him to develop his role as the authority of the family and as the priest of the family. Let him sit at the head of the table, let him start the prayer, let him have the final decision and support it. Correct him with love when he makes a mistake, hold him when he stumbles, and ask him all what you need to fulfill your role as mather of the family.
Trezor Safe 7 is the first "quantum-ready" hardware wallet.
But what does that mean? According to Trezor official documentation:
> A 'quantum ready' device is a device which will be able to run post-quantum cryptographic updates.
In other words, in case quantum computing becomes a real threat able to break elliptic curve cryptography, which would allow bad actors to sign fake firmware, users will still be able to update the real firmware and verify its integrity and authenticity because Trezor firmware is signed with a post-quantum signing algorithm. That's pretty much all.
Does it mean that your money will be safe? No. In case elliptic curve cryptography is broken, the Bitcoin (or your shitcoin) protocol must be updated to support some post-quantum cryptography signing scheme first, but even in that scenario I'm pretty sure your Trezor Safe 7 will not help you much. Basically, because nobody can predict the future and design a solution for a scenario that is completely hypothetical. But there are also some more concrete technical reasons. For example, the new TropicSquare's secure element TROPIC01 (core element in Trezor Safe 7 architecture) is not a post-quantum cryptographic coprocessor, but it is highly specialized in elliptic curve cryptography and 256-bit hash algorithms.
It could sound like something that is easy to implement and looks awesome in the product's brochureβa pure marketing move to catch the attention of uneducated buyers. I think there is something of that for sure, but it is also true that it comes with some benefits:
* In case Ed25519 is one day broken, even when quantum computing is not a reality, Trezor would have a safe way to update its firmware
* In case quantum computers break elliptic curve cryptography and a Bitcoin update is deployed, Trezor could come with firmware that helps us move funds or gain time
* It starts implementing post-quantum technology in the Bitcoin ecosystem and pushes competing products to implement new cryptographic technologies
The question then is: are users better with or without that feature? Well, they are not worse off than before and they have some very small benefits in a highly hypothetical scenario, but if we take into account that a hardware wallet is something that should be designed to last for many years, then I think it is a net positive. Tiny, but positive.
