Reporting-Cycle Suppression EXPLAINED * Q4 reporting incentivises price stability or downside, * Unrealised losses look better if volatility is muted, * Large desks lean on derivatives + thin retail books to keep spot pinned, * Retail gets shaken out, order books hollow, funding bleeds off, That creates the condition: oversold retail books + suppressed spot + exhausted sellers. Once filings are locked: * No incentive to cap upside, * Hedging rolls off, * Short gamma flips, * Spot demand doesn’t need much volume to move price, At that point the price will move fast and everyone will pretend it was “unexpected” but it won’t be magic, it’ll be permission. See, markets don’t move when people realise things. They move when constraints are lifted. Right now the constraints are: * reporting optics * risk committees * headline management * derivatives used to keep spot “orderly” Once Q4 is closed: * nobody needs to defend a narrative * hedges come off * upside becomes acceptable again For HODLers this is the timne to stack hard, really hard! For traders this is the time for discipline. Remember: "Being right early feels good, being right and patient pays." Once filings are in and restraints are being removed - that’s when the price gaps and the news will say things like "Momentum returned" or "Risk appetite improved" but they wont tell you WHY. In times like these stay mentally detached until the constraint expires. You'll avoid overtrading the suppression phase and you’re positioned when the move actually matters. When it breaks, it won’t validate you. It’ll expose them. Oh and, it's a good thing that this Bitcoin cycle hasn't been captured by wall street. *punt*
X values your privacy alright... No Elon, I'm not switching off my VPN for you. image
By the way, this is called reporting-cycle suppression oversold retail books + suppressed spot + exhausted sellers. View quoted note →
In the next couple of weeks ALL wall street firms with Bitcoin exposure - AND treasury companies - will announce their unrealised loss for Q4 of 2025. When that FUD hits the news remember, almost all of them are in the green down to ~60k. It's end of the year "accounting magic". Once that's done watch how Bitcoin will magically do it's thing again. I'll leave this here for now so I can get back to it later when their numbers drop. Baseline: → Uses last known average acquisition costs disclosed by firms → ETFs assumed to track spot (unrealised P/L ≈ neutral) → “Unrealised loss” only counted where avg dollar cost > $87,140 🏢 Public Bitcoin Treasury Companies → MicroStrategy (MSTR) → Avg cost est.: ~$35–40k → BTC held: ~190k+ → Unrealised loss: $0 (large unrealised gain) → Tesla (TSLA) → Avg cost est.: ~$43k → BTC held: ~9.7k → Unrealised loss: $0 → Coinbase (COIN) → Avg cost est.: <$30k → BTC held: ~9k → Unrealised loss: $0 → Marathon Digital (MARA) → Avg cost est.: <$25k (mined BTC) → BTC held: ~16k+ → Unrealised loss: $0 → Riot Platforms (RIOT) → Avg cost est.: <$20k (mined BTC) → BTC held: ~8k+ → Unrealised loss: $0 → Block Inc. (SQ) → Avg cost est.: ~$31k → BTC held: ~8k → Unrealised loss: $0 Subtotal (Public Treasuries): → Estimated unrealised loss: $0 🧾 Spot Bitcoin ETF Firms → IBIT (BlackRock) → Holdings valued at NAV → Unrealised loss: ~$0 → FBTC (Fidelity) → Holdings valued at NAV → Unrealised loss: ~$0 → GBTC (Grayscale) → Holdings marked to market → Unrealised loss: ~$0 → (Discount/premium is not an unrealised BTC loss) → ARKB / BITB / HODL / BTCO (Others) → Spot-backed, market-priced → Unrealised loss: ~$0 Subtotal (ETFs): → Estimated unrealised loss: $0 🧮 Aggregate Estimate → Total unrealised loss (public BTC holders + ETFs): → ≈ $0 At $87k BTC, virtually all major public holders are deeply in profit, not underwater.