Should A Bitcoin Wallet Have Rights? Artem Afian Jun 1, 2023 Like corporate entities or intelligent robots, Bitcoin wallets are poised to gain legal rights of their own. ------------------------------------------------ This is an opinion editorial by Artem Afian, a lawyer and “legal futurist” at Hiveon, a crypto mining ecosystem that offers services for Bitcoin mining hardware. ------------------------------------------------ I want to draw your attention to the fact that Bitcoin transactions ultimately occur between wallets [1]. There are humans behind wallets, but this connection is not really what’s important. The pseudonymity of Bitcoin is thanks to the fact that there is no direct connection between the wallet and the person who owns it. It is what distinguishes a Bitcoin wallet from any other financial instrument. No matter how much regulators try to change this, the core of the technology remains the same. What does this mean? It means that, soon, wallets will be recognized as entities deserving of legal rights. First, humanity began to recognize animal rights [2]. Now, there is talk about the legal rights of a robot [3]. Soon, the rights of a Bitcoin wallet will come to the fray. When one talks about the rights of robots, they usually refer to some imitation of human will that is deserving of legal recognition. We understand that a robot does not have a soul in the same way that a human does, but at the same time, it performs rather complex actions, which gives rise to legal consequences. For many of us, a robot or a Bitcoin wallet is something inanimate and devoid of a soul and, perhaps, therefore undeserving of legal protections. But we recognize the rights of companies and corporations and, of course, it is difficult to imagine more soulless forms than those. It turns out that the subjects of law can be inanimate. So, what is the difference between a Bitcoin wallet and a legal entity? A legal entity is simply a set of files in a specific registry. Lawyers even have a theory of the “fiction of a legal entity [4].” We will calmly confirm that the legal entity is an American corporation. We can quickly check this. But how to check that a legal entity was created, say, under the laws of the country of Swaziland? Even if I show you documents that prove it, they are unlikely to tell you anything. So, if I tell you that you are dealing with a foreign company, you most probably just have to believe it. Nevertheless, this legal entity, displayed as it is only on paper, has some rights. So, the Bitcoin wallet that exists is even more tangible than many legally-protected entities. Therefore, one more conclusion: Since legal entities have rights, then a wallet may have rights. Just like legal entities, wallets perform transactions, and just like legal entities, wallets can change their owners. This fact never changes: if robots or legal entities are deserving of legal rights, so too are Bitcoin wallets. I think Bitcoin is an exciting new space and that we still have a lot to explore. Now, my idea that Bitcoin wallets will inevitably receive legal rights of their own may seem crazy, but many more discoveries await us. This is a guest post by Artem Afian. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine. ------------------------------------------------ Links: [1] [2] [3] https://www.wsj.com/articles/robots-ai-legal-rights-3c47ef40 [4] . ------------------------------------------------
The Debate Around “Cursed” Ordinal Inscriptions Craig Deutsch May 31, 2023 Inscriptions that do not get indexed by the ord protocol are known as “cursed,” but whether or not to include them is an ongoing conversation. ------------------------------------------------ After only four months since the protocol was launched, ord has its first contentious debate about what are known as “cursed” inscriptions. The simplest definition of a cursed inscription is any inscription that does not currently get indexed and identified by ord. This term came about as a catchall when some people incorrectly used or purposefully misused opcodes to create inscriptions that were not able to be indexed by ord and would therefore be unrecognized and not given an inscription number. This issue was first mentioned on April 25 in the ord github [1] and the interim fix proposed by then lead developer Casey Rodarmor was to, “Modify ord to recognize the above currently invalid inscriptions, including retroactively in old blocks, but consider these new inscriptions ‘cursed’ and assign them negative inscription numbers.” Funnily enough, the example inscription code on the Ordinals docs website would have been a cursed inscription. [Link to embedded Tweet.] There are many ways cursed inscriptions can be created. Any inscription with multiple inputs/outputs would be considered cursed. As shown above, certain misuse of opcodes such as OP_1 can lead to cursed inscriptions. Alternatively, the introduction of OP_66 using a value of “cursed” intentionally made these types of inscriptions by having an even numbered opcode which is not indexed by ord. Unless already defined in the spec, even numbered opcodes are not recognized because they are reserved for future protocol development. The full list of ways to create cursed inscriptions from issue #2045 [2] is as follows: • Multiple inscriptions per transaction, for efficient batching. • Inscriptions on inputs after the first, which is useful for collections. • Multiple inscriptions on the same sat, so that the entire history of a sat doesn’t need to be checked to determine if a new inscription is valid. • Inscriptions with unrecognized even headers, so that new even headers don't cause upgraded clients to disagree about inscription numbers. There are a couple specific debates around cursed inscriptions. One of the disputes comes from the way that these inscriptions are currently numbered. Cursed inscriptions are numbered negatively in the order of their creation. Because of this numbering system and naming convention, some people purposefully chose to create inscriptions and collections that appear “cursed” whether by flipping the image of a positively numbered inscription or using a more sinister image theme when inscribing. The question is: Should these be appended to the index of positively numbered inscriptions or should they keep their negative inscription number when the code is updated? Additionally, another contentious conversation is what to do about the certain type of cursed inscriptions that used the OP_66 opcode in their creation. Because this opcode is not recognized by ord and even numbered opcodes are intentionally left out for future development use, it is debatable whether inscriptions using this opcode should be included in the cursed set or if they should be rejected. At the present time, the issue around the even number opcode [3] is listed in the ord github. There are many comments in support of including these inscriptions in the index, but the lead maintainers of the protocol seem to be against it. As of now, the current stance by the developers is that these inscriptions would be unbound, meaning that they would not be assigned to a specific satoshi. Remember, ordinal theory works based on a first in, first out tracking system for satoshis. Each inscription is assigned to the first satoshi in the genesis transaction when the inscription is created. This type of lens for looking at bitcoin allows images, files, text, etc. to be tracked and transferred. If a cursed inscription is unbound, it would not be associated with a specific satoshi and therefore would be unable to be transferred to another address. Many people who are inscribing are hoping to be able to sell or transfer their inscription to another person. While the inscriptions using this opcode will live forever on the Bitcoin blockchain, if these inscriptions are classified as unbound and unassigned to a specific satoshi, users who minted cursed inscriptions using this opcode would be unable to sell or transfer them. Herein lies one of the bigger concerns for people who are spending money on transaction fees to create cursed inscriptions. If they are unable to sell them in the future, significant funds would have been wasted on fees. Many users have responded to the github issue, expressing support for including these inscriptions, but the code’s maintainers are not in favor of recognizing cursed inscriptions using the OP_66 even numbered opcode. On May 30, the new lead maintainer of ord, Raphjaph, wrote [4], “As the protocol currently stands inscriptions are not valid if they use an unrecognized even tag, so this change already makes a concession by recognizing them. For now they are unbound but we might reconsider this and bind them in the future if there are strong reasons.” This response is not what many inscribers were hoping to hear. Similar to Bitcoin, ord is open-source software so users can fork the code if they wish to recognize these specific types of cursed inscriptions. This contentious debate is ongoing and the path forward for ord remains to be seen. Users who spent significant sums on transaction fees may be willing to switch to a new version of ord that will recognize their cursed inscriptions, but this is only a theoretical path forward at this time. Regardless, Ordinals are a new technology being built on Bitcoin. Whether inscriptions are a flash in the pan or if they have lasting power may depend on how this issue gets resolved. ------------------------------------------------ #Inscriptions #Debate #BitcoinDeveloper #Ordinals Links: [1] [2] [3] [4] ------------------------------------------------
Liquidators Of Sam Bankman-Fried’s Alameda Research Have Scavenged $110 Million Of Bitcoin After Losing Billions BtcCasey May 31, 2023 Analysis by Arkham Intelligence indicates that Alameda's liquidators have managed to acquire slightly more than 4,000 bitcoin. ------------------------------------------------ Liquidators in charge of the recovery of assets for the now-disgraced Alameda Research [1] hedge fund founded by Sam Bankman-Fried currently control over $110 million worth of bitcoin held in various wallets, according to a report supplied by blockchain analysis firm Arkham Intelligence [2]. These wallets have been receiving BTC from exchanges and cold wallets as recently as March 2023, the report revealed. The aggregation of these wallets provides insights into the liquidators' collection of BTC from Alameda's holdings. A recent transaction in April involved a 1 BTC test from Alameda's Merchant wallet. This BTC was later sent to a holding address now under the control of Alameda's Liquidators, known as 'Alameda Merchant 1.' Since the beginning of 2023, this address has accumulated 3,581 BTC, worth approximately $97.19 million at current prices. The report states that “In total, Alameda’s liquidators have managed to secure 4,083 BTC (currently $110.81M) sourced from: • Other Alameda Wallets: 34.94 BTC (currently worth $948.27K) • Deribit: 467.366 BTC (currently worth $12.68M) • WBTC Custodian: 2997 BTC (currently worth $81.34M) • Bitfinex: 298.027 BTC (currently worth $8.09M) ° Unlabelled Wallets (possibly an Exchange): 286.7 BTC (currently worth $7.78M)” image [A screenshot from the provided report.] “However, this is only a fraction of the BTC that Alameda controlled in the past,” the report noted. “Wallets connected to this network of Alameda’s BTC activity were worth at peak over $800M, with Alameda likely holding more BTC in Centralized Exchanges or unlinked Cold Wallets.” Arkham Intelligence stated that it will continue to monitor the on-chain activity of Alameda’s liquidators. ------------------------------------------------ Links: [1] [2] ------------------------------------------------
Did The New York Times Publish Manipulated Footage Of A Bitcoin Mine? Level39 May 31, 2023 Footage accompanying a New York Times article critical of Bitcoin mining appears to have been manipulated to reinforce the paper’s bias. This is an opinion editorial by Level39, a researcher focused on Bitcoin, technology, history, ethics and energy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Did The New York Times manipulate aerial drone photography for its recent article attacking Bitcoin mining, in order to make the air in Rockdale, Texas appear smoggy? On April 9, 2023, the paper published its article, "The Real-World Costs Of The Digital Race For Bitcoin[1]," which included attacks on Bitcoin miners who purchase energy through sanctioned demand-response programs [2] within the state’s energy grid. image [Sources: Twitter[3], nytimes.com[4]] The article featured a sweeping hero video banner [5], which was also used as a still image for social media sharing, showing smog-filled aerial drone footage [6] over operations run by Bitdeer, a Bitcoin mining company that occupies a previously-abandoned aluminum smelting plant on the outskirts of Rockdale. However, evidence suggests that the footage may have either been manipulated [7] or lacks the necessary color grading that would have maintained photojournalistic integrity and adhered to ethical standards. Links: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Color Histograms And Image Manipulation Color histograms are useful for analyzing the exposure and color balance of an image [1]. A color histogram is essentially a bar chart where the left side of the x-axis is black and the right side is white. The y-axis represents the number of pixels found in the image, for each part of the tonal scale between black and white. A properly exposed photograph, where the full spectrum of tonal blacks and whites are naturally found in a scene, will have pixels that span across the entire x-axis, from left to right [2]. When color data fails to span the entire x-axis, it can show that either those tones were entirely unavailable to the camera sensor, or that manipulation was performed to purposefully omit those colors. In the side-by-side comparison below, the color histogram in the aerial footage published by the Times [3] (left) has no pixels approaching the black point. This is particularly strange for footage that has bright sun and stark shadows that are clearly visible as the camera moves over the scene. When color parameters are enhanced and corrected (as shown below in the version on the right), a brighter and more stunning scene emerges. image [The color histogram [4] for the image on the left, featured on The New York Times’ [5] website, has a distinct gap between its color data and its black point, possibly indicating either an improperly exposed image [6] or manipulation to add a smog effect [7]. The photo on the right has been color corrected, showing a normalized histogram with the full range of colors and indicating that the Times’ version seems to have been altered for effect.] The hazy footage used by the Times may give readers a false impression that rural Texas air has been polluted by Bitcoin mining. Bitcon mines are fully electrified and, like electric vehicles [8], the mining facilities photographed by The Times have zero Scope 1 carbon emissions. In other words [9], there are no direct greenhouse (GHG) emissions [10] that occur from sources that are controlled or owned by the operators of the mines. Any indirect Scope 2 emissions [11] associated from mining’s energy use comes from the grid’s normal emissions. Links: [1] https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/how-to-read-your-cameras-histogram [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reply Hazy, Try Again The alleged manipulation appears to have been indirectly confirmed by Jordan Vonderhaar, the freelance photographer who took the aerial footage in question. Vonderhaar published another photo from the same drone [1] flight on his personal website [2], showing that the weather was perfectly clear within moments of the hazy photo published by the Times. This clear photo, from a different angle, indicates that the missing color data in the hazy photo was not due to weather conditions. image [Vonderhaar published a clear weather photo on his personal website [3], taken within minutes [4] of the photo that showed smog surrounding the same Bitdeer mine.] Vonderhaar's clear and sunny photo was also featured on the front page of the Times’ print edition [5] (from April 11, 2023), with a color histogram that had similarities to the one found in the smoggy photo — another extended black point. Normalizing the black and white points on Vonderhaar's portfolio image reveals vibrant colors and a sunny morning in Rockdale. Notice in the side-by-side comparison below that the Times intentionally cropped out some of the blue skies when it published this particular shot: image [The image on the left was published on the April 11, 2023, front page of the Times’ print edition [6]. In addition to cropping out the blue skies, it appears to have had its black point extended, to wash out colors, as evidenced by the gap [7] between the color histogram data and the black point. Normalizing [8] the color histogram (right), brings out the full color spectrum.] Vonderhaar’s photo on his portfolio site included full Exif metadata [9] that shows details about the imaging, such as the fact that it was taken on the morning of February 28, 2023, at 8:02 a.m. in raw [10] format, with a DJI FC220, the camera supplied by the DJI Mavic Pro drone [11]. Analysis of the shadows in the photo not only confirms this timing, but further analysis also indicates that the smoggy video footage [12] was taken only nine minutes after [13] the photo that showed clear and smog-free air surrounding the mine. Yet, the golden hues from the morning sunlight and blue skies are completely missing from the hazy hero footage. That a perfectly gorgeous moment in Rockdale could suddenly become hazy, at all altitudes and distances only nine minutes later, is nearly impossible. image [Footage filmed nine minutes apart shows both clear weather and smog. Photos by Jordan Vonderhaar (top, middle), Shademap [14] (bottom), via @yeolddoc [15].] Responding to allegations of manipulation, Vonderhaar — who described miners as “massive polluters [16]” — publicly stated on Twitter [17] that, “Nothing about the footage was doctored. It’s humid most mornings in Texas and when the sun rises you get low level haze. This is very common.” Leaving aside for a moment that Vonderhaar appears to be admitting that he was perhaps intentionally seeking out hazy weather for his photojournalistic spread, the nearest automated weather observation station [18], located at Hearne Municipal Airport — 40 miles to the Northeast [19] and well out of view of the aerial photography — reported low-level fog [20] at that same moment. Indeed, Vonderhaar's clear and sunny photo shows low-level fog on the distant horizon, many miles beyond Alcoa Lake. “Low-level” fog is not a high-altitude phenomenon, and sure enough, Vonderhaar's photo shows blue skies in the upper atmosphere and golden hues that are conspicuously missing in his smoggy footage, taken a few minutes later. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Links: [1] https://archive.ph/QVUQ9 [2] [3] [4] [5] 📄.pdf [6] 📄.pdf [7] [8] [9] https://archive.is/Bqamk [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] https://twitter.com/jordan_vondy/status/1645446668635058176 [17] https://twitter.com/jordan_vondy/status/1645455851006640130 [18] [19] [20] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problems Uncovered Rory Highside [1] — a VFX artist who has expertise in CGI video effects [2] — was among the first to notice problems with the footage that the Times had used. Analyzing the video and color histograms, Highside suspected that either the color grading was mishandled or the color balance had been manipulated [3]. One of the most noticeable issues was that the “black point” was extended, which is indicative of footage that is washed out [4]. This was evidenced by the fact that, as colors approached black, there was a noticeable and unnatural gap between pitch black and the available color data where darker colors should be. Vonderhaar did not respond to these allegations on Twitter, and did not respond to questions about them by email. image [Analysis by Rory Highside [5] of Vonderhaar’s Times footage.] Links: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Hazy Truth Of Photojournalism Determining truth in photojournalism is a murky endeavor. The raw footage captured by professional-grade digital cameras can be thought of as the digital version of undeveloped film. Camera sensors capture raw data, which retains maximum image information and flexibility [1] during post-processing, but requires processing and interpolation to produce an accurate final image. The photographer must adjust various parameters, such as contrast, white balance, exposure, and color saturation — meaning the photographer always has some artistic leeway in the final product. Color manipulations are trivial adjustments in post production. It only takes one slight adjustment [2] to wash out an image. Minor adjustments are very common, and typically not an issue. But, at the end of the process, photographers have to walk a fine line between ​​enhancing an image for visual impact and maintaining its authenticity. Links: [1] [2] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unedited Raw Drone Footage Is Visibly Hazy There is perhaps an alternate explanation for why Vonderhaar’s video footage was so hazy and lacking in contrast, while his still photograph taken nine minutes earlier was sunny and cinematic. The FC220 camera on Vonderhaar’s DJI Mavic Pro drone is capable of capturing video footage in a logarithmic (log) color profile [1]. Raw log footage is a flat and low-contrast format — not intended for publishing — that preserves a wide dynamic range of details, which allows for greater flexibility during post-processing. Much like how negative film [2] has inverted colors that enable positive images to be developed, log video footage always appears hazy when its raw, unedited format isn’t properly color graded [3].It would be the photojournalist’s responsibility, then, to accurately map to the colors they witnessed in real life. image [DJI drones can record in a logarithmic (log) color profile, which appears hazy if it isn’t color graded in post-processing [4]. Source: “Shooting In D-Log - DJI Mavic Pro [5].”] To convert log footage to an accurate color profile, a process called “color grading” or “color correction” is typically performed [6]. This involves adjusting the image's color and tonal properties to achieve a more visually pleasing and accurate representation of the scene. The proper conversion from log [7] involves mapping the tonal values in the log footage to their corresponding values, such as with lookup tables, or LUTS, to color grade the final footage. Vonderhaar could very well have been telling the truth when he claimed [8] that “Nothing about the footage was doctored.” Indeed, publishing unedited log footage without proper color grading would quite literally result in a misleading smog effect, without having to do anything. Doing this deliberately, of course, would be unethical if it intentionally misleads viewers into seeing smog that did not exist. Photojournalists have a duty [9] to maintain journalistic integrity and adhere to ethical standards to truthfully convey the events they witnessed. While there is no definitive "correct" color to any image, intentionally misleading readers by failing to color grade log footage is a breach of ethical standards. Photojournalists must depict the scene as faithfully as possible, avoiding anything that might distort reality. Publishing raw and uncorrected video footage, which actively removes colors from a scene and creates a misleading smog effect, is effectively a passive form of photographic manipulation. If not manipulation, then it is an egregious example of Hanlon’s razor [10]. It should be noted that Vonderhaar’s lack of color grading may not be due to malice or even artistic bias. While a professional photographer who has expertise in color correcting raw still images [11] to JPEG may possess a solid foundation in color correction and a good understanding of color theory, it does not automatically mean they have the necessary skills to color grade log video footage. Color grading log video involves a different set of skills and considerations [12] compared to color correcting raw still images [13]. Expertise in video editing software and a specific understanding of the technical aspects of working with video formats — such as frame rates, codecs and color spaces — is a requirement to adeptly work with log footage. Managing temporal continuity and ensuring consistent color grading is critical to maintaining visual coherence. It’s entirely plausible that Vonderhaar was simply unable to color grade log video. But, whether it be malice or inability, the Times should issue a correction. Links: [1] https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4978813437/how-to-shoot-log-video-using-dji-s-d-log-color-profile [2] [3] [4] https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4978813437/how-to-shoot-log-video-using-dji-s-d-log-color-profile [5] [6] [7] https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4978813437/how-to-shoot-log-video-using-dji-s-d-log-color-profile [8] https://twitter.com/jordan_vondy/status/1645455851006640130 [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Signature Style Of The Times The Times has a signature style for its photographs [1], where it typically darkens images when it wants to portray a somber or moody tone. However, an extended black point — resulting in washed out colors — is the direct opposite of this iconic style. image [The Times’ signature photographic style [2] uses an extended white point that slightly darkens the image.] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Links: [1] [2] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Ethics Of Photo Manipulation All photography requires some form of color correction. Minor stylistic choices aside, adjustments that actively mislead readers are unethical [1]. A 2015 article in the Times [2] about a World Press Photo research project, for instance, explained that photo editors cross an ethical line, which becomes explicit manipulation, when their processing obscures an image to create conditions that were not actually in the scene: “The only point at which processing becomes manipulation is when the toning is so great — usually by transforming significant parts of an image to opaque black or white — that it obscures substantial detail.” –“Debating The Rules And Ethics Of Digital Photojournalism [3],” The New York Times According to Highside, the extent of the manipulation and our ability to restore the full color potential will remain unknown unless Vonderhaar releases his original raw footage. The Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) recommends in its code of ethics [4] that journalists need to be proactive about addressing concerns and allegations of improper conduct: “Ethical journalism means taking responsibility for one’s work and explaining one’s decisions to the public. Journalists should: Explain ethical choices and processes to audiences. Encourage a civil dialogue with the public about journalistic practices, coverage and news content. Respond quickly to questions about accuracy, clarity and fairness. Acknowledge mistakes and correct them promptly and prominently. Explain corrections and clarifications carefully and clearly. Expose unethical conduct in journalism, including within their organizations. Abide by the same high standards they expect of others.” –SPJ code of ethics [5] Despite the missing color data, which can only be sourced from Vonderhaar’s unreleased raw footage, Highside was able to partially restore the washed out footage to demonstrate what the imaging could have looked like if a proper color grading had been applied. The results are striking when compared alongside the video that was published by the Times: Intentionally deciding not to color grade or fully correct log footage is a breach of ethical standards in photojournalism. However, if it was due to lack of ability, it can still be considered a breach of ethical standards, particularly if the Times fails to correct the misinformation or take appropriate action to rectify the situation. A fundamental principle [6] of photojournalism is to provide an accurate and truthful representation of events. Misrepresenting the visual aspects of a scene goes against this principle and compromises the integrity of the profession. It undermines the credibility of photojournalists and the publication, it damages the reputation of the profession and erodes public trust in the media. It’s unclear why the Times is seemingly motivated [7] to deliberately portray Bitcoin mining in such a negative light. It appears to fit a long pattern of distortions and bias [8] from the newspaper, which has become more evident to readers in recent years. When the public is being misled by photojournalists into believing a small and rural Texas town has thick smog typically found in populated and polluted cities, it’s necessary and appropriate to question the paper’s ethical choices. Vonderhaar could clear up suspicions over his work by releasing the original raw log footage. This would allow members of the public to properly assess the color grading of the footage and reveal the true details that were present [9]. If indeed the log footage was intentionally left in a low contrast state, it would be an embarrassment for the Times. Links: [1] http://spj.org/ethicscode.asp [2] [3] [4] http://spj.org/ethicscode.asp [5] http://spj.org/ethicscode.asp [6] [7] [8] https://www.thegrayladywinked.com/ [9] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a guest post by Level39. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.
Pro-Bitcoin Legislation Reigns Victorious In Texas This Year As The Legislative Session Ends BtcCasey May 30, 2023 In addition to the Texas bills, the latest proposed debt ceiling deal did not include the Biden Administration’s proposed 30% tax on Bitcoin miners. Bitcoin policy advocates celebrated several victories in the recent quarter, including the success of Texas SB 1929, a pro-mining bill, and the defeat of Texas SB 1751, an anti-mining bill. VP of Research at Riot Platforms Pierre Rochard expressed gratitude [1] to everyone involved, stating, "Texas will continue to be #Bitcoin country!" These legislative outcomes will contribute to the growth and stability of Bitcoin mining operations in Texas. As Brian Morgenstern, head of public policy at Riot Platforms reported [2], SB 1751 did not pass, ensuring the continuation of the state's usage of Bitcoin miners’ flexibility in balancing and stabilizing the power grid. In contrast, SB 1929 successfully passed, establishing a registration process for Bitcoin miners to share information with ERCOT, enhancing transparency and grid reliability. Additionally, HB 591 was approved, providing a tax incentive for utilizing gas that would otherwise be flared into the atmosphere for on-site Bitcoin mining, promoting emissions reduction. Another significant development was the passing of HB 1666, which introduced a proof-of-reserves regime, positioning Texas as a leader in building confidence within the digital asset ecosystem. These legislative achievements reflect the collaborative efforts of various stakeholders and industry participants, including Riot Platforms, The Texas Blockchain Council and the Chamber of Digital Commerce according to Morgenstern. In addition to these developments, public miner stocks also surged on the news that the U.S. debt ceiling deal may be finalized soon, and that it does not include President Joe Biden’s proposed 30% tax [3] on energy used for Bitcoin mining. While these successes mark important milestones, advocates acknowledge that their work is far from over. But the Bitcoin community remains optimistic about the future and the continued growth of the industry, with the positive outcomes achieved in Texas during this legislative session setting a favorable precedent for Bitcoin-related policies and innovation in the United States. Links: [1] [2] [3]
Paxful Announces Appointment Of Interim CEO Roshan Dharia BtcCasey May 30, 2023 Dharia will act as CEO as the exchange continues its transition from previous leadership under Ray Youssef. Paxful [1], a global peer-to-peer Bitcoin platform, has announced the appointment of Roshan Dharia as the new Interim Chief Executive Officer, effective immediately. This comes after a brief shutdown period [2] of the exchange prior to the departure of Co-Founder and former CEO Ray Youssef. According to a press release sent to Bitcoin Magazine, Dharia will be responsible for strengthening operations and exploring strategic alternatives for the company. With over eight years of experience, Dharia expressed his enthusiasm for the role, stating, "It's a great honor to become CEO of Paxful. Over the last eight years, Paxful has been a pioneer in establishing the real use cases of Bitcoin and helping millions of people in the process." Previously a senior executive at TrustToken (now known as Archblock), Dharia led the DeFi institutional lending business. He also founded and built the investment platform PTHL Affiliates, specializing in distressed private company acquisitions and turnarounds. Srinivas Raju, the Custodian of Paxful, expressed his confidence in Dharia's leadership, stating, "I'm delighted that Roshan has joined Paxful and will take over day-to-day management of the company. I'm confident under his leadership the business will keep building a financial system that truly serves the 100%." Youssef’s recent departure at Paxful was reportedly [3] a result of a feud involving a myriad of accusations and legal disputes with co-founder Artur Schaback, who is currently the COO of the exchange. Since its establishment in 2015, Paxful has experienced significant growth, attracting over 12 million users worldwide and facilitating billions of dollars in trades on its platform, according to the press release. Links: [1] http://paxful.com/ [2] [3]
Stablecoin Issuer Tether To Begin Bitcoin Mining Operations In Uruguay BtcCasey May 30, 2023 The company behind the most widely used U.S. dollar stablecoin is set to enter the mining industry through collaborations in Uruguay. Tether, the company behind the widely popular USD stablecoin, has announced its foray into energy production and sustainable Bitcoin mining operations in Uruguay. According to the announcement [1], Tether’s collaboration with a local licensed company marks the company’s expansion into the energy sector as part of its goal to become a global tech leader. By investing in renewable energy sources, Tether said it aims to support and promote sustainable Bitcoin mining, ensuring a “minimal ecological footprint while upholding the security and integrity of the Bitcoin network.” Paolo Ardoino, CTO of Tether, emphasized the company's commitment to renewable energy, stating, "Tether is proud to spearhead a movement that combines cutting-edge technology, sustainable practices, and financial innovation." Uruguay has gained recognition as a leader in renewable energy, with an impressive 94% of electricity generation sourced from renewable sources such as wind and solar power according to the announcement. The country's favorable conditions for renewable energy production, including wind farms, solar parks and hydropower projects, make it an ideal location for Tether's sustainable mining operations. The company also stated that Uruguay's robust and reliable grid system further ensures efficient and sustainable mining activities. Tether is actively seeking experts in the energy sector to join its team and contribute to this innovative project. For more information on Tether's energy initiative and potential career opportunities, interested individuals can visit their website at tether.recruitee.com/energy. [1] https://tether.to/en/tether-invests-in-energy-production-and-sustainable-bitcoin-mining-in-uruguay/
Sabre56 Announces New Partnership With GEM Mining To Host More Than 4,500 Bitcoin Miners BtcCasey May 30, 2023 The partnership will see half of the machines come online in Wyoming by May, with the other half coming the next month. Sabre56, a Bitcoin mining hosting provider and digital asset mining consultancy, has announced a significant hosting deal with GEM Mining, an institutional-grade Bitcoin mining company. The agreement entails Sabre56 hosting 4,510 BTC miners that belong to GEM in its newly constructed facilities in Wyoming. Half of the miners will come online in May, with the remaining miners joining in June. This deal marks a significant milestone for Sabre56 as it transitions from consulting on mining projects to constructing and hosting its own facilities. The CEO of Sabre56, Phil Harvey, expressed his enthusiasm for the partnership with GEM Mining, emphasizing their shared values and dedication to advancing the mining industry. Harvey stated, "Sabre56 is rapidly implementing a strategic shift to build full-service hosting facilities with the highest technical and environmental standards ... This initial placing of 4,510 machines by GEM Mining proves our ability to support the market's most mature players and provide industry-leading hosting solutions." GEM Mining's CEO, John S. Warren, echoed the sentiment, emphasizing the importance of finding a partner like Sabre56 that operates in a similarly efficient manner. Warren commented, "We are delighted to place our machines with a hosting provider of such outstanding capabilities." According to a press release sent to Bitcoin Magazine, Both Sabre56 and GEM Mining are committed to environmentally responsible growth, with Sabre56's facilities adhering to strict regulatory standards. The data centers are built for maximum energy efficiency, the announcement states, and the companies work in cooperation with utility providers, allowing for load shedding to benefit the grids they operate on.
The Bitcoin Standard Author Saifedean Ammous Joins El Salvador’s National Bitcoin Office As Economic Advisor BtcCasey May 30, 2023 Ammous’ expertise in Bitcoin and economics will be a valuable addition to the Bitcoin Office’s mission. Dr. Saifedean Ammous, prominent economist and author of "The Bitcoin Standard," is poised to take on a new role as an Economic Advisor to El Salvador's Bitcoin Office. This appointment comes after El Salvador made history by becoming the first country to adopt bitcoin as legal tender [1] in September 2021. “Having Saifedean Ammous on team El Salvador is fantastic,” Max Keiser, Senior Bitcoin Advisor to the country said in a statement to Bitcoin Magazine. “Ammous brilliantly captured the role of Bitcoin as, ‘The alternative to Central Banking’ in his now classic, ‘The Bitcoin Standard’ as well as the philosophy of Bitcoin including popularizing the idea of 'time preference' as a life-hack. This news makes me very happy.” Ammous, known for his expertise in Bitcoin and monetary economics, is expected to provide valuable guidance and insights to the Bitcoin Office as it navigates the implementation and integration of Bitcoin into the country's economy. His extensive knowledge and research on the subject have earned him recognition within the community and beyond. The Bitcoin Law, proposed by El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele and approved by the Legislative Assembly, has set the stage for a new era in the country's financial landscape. With Ammous joining as an Economic Advisor, El Salvador aims to leverage his expertise to maximize the benefits and address potential challenges associated with adopting bitcoin as legal tender. The Bitcoin Office, established to oversee the implementation of the Bitcoin Law, will likely benefit from Ammous' insights on monetary policy, sound money principles and the potential economic implications of embracing a decentralized digital currency. His appointment signals El Salvador's commitment to incorporating expert opinions into their strategy and decision-making process. Links: [1]
Umbrel Announces New Umbrel Home Plug-And-Play Server BtcCasey May 30, 2023 The new Umbrel Home comes with a 2TB SSD and outperforms Raspberry Pi 4-based servers in many capacities. Umbrel [1], the company behind umbrelOS [2], has introduced a new home server solution called Umbrel Home with the intent of providing users control over their data, privacy and digital lives, according to a press release sent to Bitcoin Magazine. Priced at $699, Umbrel Home is aimed at making self-hosting accessible to everyone. By leveraging umbrelOS, users can eliminate the need for third-party cloud services by utilizing a wide range of self-hosted apps available in the Umbrel App Store including a Bitcoin/Lightning node, Nextcloud, Plex and Home Assistant. image According to the press release, Umbrel Home offers accelerated performance, featuring a 2.9GHz Quad-Core Intel CPU, 2TB NVMe SSD, 16GB dual-channel RAM, and an active cooling system while consuming just 10 watts of power. This compact home server outperforms a Raspberry Pi 4-based solution in terms of CPU performance, SSD read and write speeds, RAM and memory bandwidth the release states. Mayank Chhabra, Umbrel's Co-founder and CEO, highlighted the company's vision for Umbrel Home, saying that "Building a plug-and-play home server that was specifically engineered for umbrelOS has been our dream since day one. With the recent challenges in Raspberry Pi pricing and supply chain, we knew it was time to bring our vision to life, set a new benchmark in self-hosting, and make it accessible to users of all skill levels." With privacy and data ownership concerns on the rise, self-hosting presents a modern solution that allows users to take ownership of their data, storage, access and sharing. In addition, Umbrel Home’s zero-configuration and one-click app installations from the Umbrel App Store make it easy to build a customized ecosystem tailored to individual needs. Pre-orders for Umbrel Home are now available on umbrel.com, with shipping set to begin in June 2023. With its exceptional performance, user-friendly features and affordability, Umbrel Home aims to make self-hosting accessible to a global audience. Links: [1] [2]