**Fediverse Report – #134**## The NewsMastodon is finally [introducing]( ) quote posts to their software, with the feature rolling out next week to the servers managed by Mastodon itself, and becoming available in Mastodon 4.5 soon after. Mastodon always had a significant worry that quote posts would lead to ‘dunking’ behaviour, where people would quote post someone else for clout. This is visible in how Mastodon has implemented the feature, and how their blog posts introduces the feature: it sees quote posts as a powerful tool that can easily be misused. That is why Mastodon has focused on giving users control over who can quote their posts; you can select per post if you want nobody, everybody, or only your followers to be able to quote your posts. You are also able to change this after you’ve made a post and somebody quotes your post in a manner you are do not want. In that case you can remove your original post from the other person’s quote post. Giving people more control over how their data can be used is a great thing, and Mastodon adding quote posts in a manner that allows for people to determine how and if their posts can be quoted is a good implementation choice. Mastodon’s concern regarding the potential for harm with dunking does need some context however, researcher Hilda Bastian has a [highly detailed overview]( ) of over 30 studies on quote posts on Twitter and their impact. Bastian notes: “There’s conflicting evidence on whether QTs increase or decrease incivility, and whatever effect there is, it doesn’t seem to be major.” Bluesky added a[ similar feature for quote posts]( ) in summer 2024, also allowing people to select when their posts can be quoted, and also described them as anti-toxicity features. I’m not aware of any study on how this feature on Bluesky affected toxic behaviour. Bridgy Fed, the software that connects ActivityPub with Bluesky’s AT Protocol, has gotten a new [feature]( ) where you will get notified of interactions from non-bridged accounts. When you ‘bridge’ your account, it allows people on the other social network to interact with your posts. When someone replies to you on the other protocol, and they also have your account bridged, the replies show up on your posts, as if you were interacting with each other over the same protocol. But if the other person on the other network replies to a post, and they have not bridged their account, these replies are not visible, as they’ve not consented to getting their data send out on the other protocol. As such it becomes easy to miss interactions with your post that happen on the other protocol. A New Social, the organisation behind Bridgy Fed, has launched an update where you will now get an hourly digest DM with links to the interactions on the other network. And if you do not want to receive the DMs, you can alter this in the [Bridgy Fed settings page]( ), or with a simple ‘mute’ as a reply. The .world cluster is a group of fediverse servers all managed by FediHosting Foundation. The cluster contains servers such as the mastodon.world server and the lemmy.world server, which makes it one of the largest admins of fediverse users. The organisation shared an [update]( ), where they announced that they’ve expanded with a new piefed.world server. They also gave an update on their finances, with costs around 2000 USD per month, but income having dropped to around 1300 USD due to less donations. As the .world cluster of servers represents a significant portion of the fediverse, and contains the largest threadiverse server with lemmy.world, the financial health of the cluster is worth paying attention to. A small piece of news that I think is worth highlighting: the iOS client IceCubes will [not have support]( ) for the GoToSocial software, because the GoToSocial Code of Conduct prohibits contributions that are generated by AI. Every software is political in some form, and fediverse software makes the political aspect of software much more explicit. The fediverse talks about the plural politics of people often in terms of servers and moderation. By having many different servers, people can join the community that they align with. What’s interesting to me about this disagreement between GoToSocial and IceCubes is that this can extent to software itself as well. There is value in having multiple different clients that all offer roughly the same function, and having multiple different microblogging platforms that all do the same thing of posting. Software is political, and that people can express their politics via the software they choose is a good thing about the fediverse.## The Links<li><a href="https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2025/09/trunk-tidbits-august-2025/">Mastodon’s monthly engineering update, Trunks &amp; Tidbits, for August 2025.</a></li><li><a href="https://mitra.social/post/01993fe3-2dac-3533-6a81-9e653c9d94e0">This week’s fediverse software updates.</a></li><li>An <a href="https://pc.cafe/@fedicat/115186898466034123">updated list</a> of all 37 Mastodon iOS apps that are currently actively maintained on the Apple App Store.</li><li>The Fireside Fedi show t<a href="https://video.firesidefedi.live/w/q3z3C6JrpitEUxwFmwiTUo">alks with NodeBB creator Julian Lam</a>.</li><li><a href="https://joinpeertube.org/news/release-7.3">PeerTube v7.3 is out</a>, and it adds additional customisation features for admins, as well as the ability to schedule live streams.</li>#nlnet image
**Fediverse Report – #129**## The News[SocialHub]( ) is a Discourse forum that has served as the main ActivityPub discussion forum for a long time. The platform might shut down on September 10th, as the current platform operators have stated that [unless]( ) they can find a community that is willing to take over the infrastructure, they will shut down the platform. SocialHub has been run since 2019 by the small organisation called [Petites Singularités]( ), although in effect the administration of the platform came largely down to a [single]( ) administrator. The current administrator Hellekin is also [explicit]( ) in looking for a team of multiple people to take over, not a single individual, and other requirements for the new team are [implied]( ) as well. There have been offers from individuals to take over the technical aspect, but there is less interested in the community management type of work. A number of fediverse developers also [question]( ) the value that SocialHub still can bring, who see that most fediverse developers have already left SocialHub, or were never even a part of it in the first place. It is easy to [hypothesise]( ) a ActivityPub developer platform that contains reference material, documentations and lively discussions. But as Arnold Schrijver [points]( ) out, it is “much harder it is to get people to collab and connect their otherwise independent initiatives, and still harder it is to find people doing the chores to maintain that.” Other efforts such as [fedidevs.org]( ) have largely petered out, and it is unclear if there is enough interest from developers to collaborate on maintaining such a place. Reading the conversations about SocialHub makes it clear that people can point to the various issues with how SocialHub functioned and what potential improvements could look like. But any changes to SocialHub beyond “a forum used by a sub-section of the community where people occasionally ask questions” requires community building, which takes significant time and effort by skilled people to do so. While there are people willing to contribute technical admin skills as well as financial support, it is the community management part that is more challenging to find. The challenge remains that SocialHub, even though most ActivityPub developers do not participate in that forum, is the primary forum for discussing ActivityPub, by virtue of no other prominent other forum existing as a place for developer conversations about the fediverse and ActivityPub. It leads to a challenging situation:<li>Most <a href="https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/socialhub-developer-community-reboot-or-shutdown/5445/69?u=laurens">conversations</a> about the fediverse and ActivityPub do not take place on SocialHub.</li><li>There is value in having a place for conversations about the fediverse and ActivityPub that is focused on longer conversations and not dependent on one’s social graph.</li><li>For a number of reasons a significant number of fediverse developers see SocialHub as not a great place for such conversations.</li><li>There is no consensus on what a different place would look like, what its purpose is, and who should run such a place.</li><li>Even if someone where to start a new place, or take over SocialHub, it is unclear if developers would actually participate in such an effort.</li><li>The current administrator of SocialHub is looking for a group of multiple people with a coherent idea of how to create SocialHub into a community platform, but with most developers acting as individuals all with slightly different ideas, it is unclear if such a group can be found.</li> As of right now it is unsure if a solution can be reached, either by rebooting SocialHub or by creating a new place for conversations about the fediverse. Last week I [wrote]( ) that FediCon shows that there is value in having fediverse developers meet together. While it’s good to see this happening offline, having spaces for conversations online is important as well. A list published by [Drop News Site]( ) contains over 100k websites that Meta allegedly has scraped for their data to train their AI, and the list also [contains]( ) a number of fediverse servers. A communications representative for Meta [says]( ) that the list is ‘bogus’. While it is difficult to verify the correctness of this specific news story, that Meta is scraping fediverse data for AI training is certainly plausible: the data is publicly accessible and Meta so far has shown an insatiable hunger to ingest as much data as possible for AI training purposes. Meta has shown a willingness to acquire data via methods that seem [legally questionable]( ) in the most optimistic reading possible. While collecting fediverse data for AI training may potentially fall within legal boundaries, it goes against the clear wishes of the fediverse community. The story points to how difficult it has been to evolve the fediverse to a network where people can actually publish their consent on how their data can be handled by others. The privacy policy of a significant number of fediverse servers, including some servers on the published list above, explicitly state: “Your public content may be downloaded by other servers in the network.” However, [public]( ) [response]( ) to this news makes it clear that for a significant number of people, they do not want Meta to be handling their public social networking data to be used for AI training. There has been some effort by the Mastodon organisation to update the their Terms of Service (ToS) to prohibit the use of that server’s data for AI training purposes, but Mastodon had to [retract]( ) that new ToS due to various criticisms. It is unclear however if such a ToS would be binding to third parties who have not signed the ToS. What’s more notable for me is that there is still no easy way for fediverse users to indicate their consent how their data can be handled on a per-post level that is also distributed via ActivityPub and is machine-readable. A significant group of fediverse users do not want their data to be used for AI training, but so far their options are mainly limited to being on a server who prohibits this via regulation, and there are no easy ways to set consent on a per-user level. Mastodon shared in their monthly engineering update, [Trunks and Tidbits]( ), that the organisation is working on adding Starter Packs. Starter Packs were first launched by Bluesky, and found great popularity late last year. It allows people to create lists of accounts, and other users can follow all these accounts with a single click of a button. The feature allowed new Bluesky users to rapidly on-board the platform and get a timeline full of content. However, the feature also had some major drawbacks, such as being used for spammy engagement-bait accounts to build large following networks. People also could not opt-out of being included on other people’s Starter Packs, which caused some people to get a large number of followers that they did not want or ask for, leading to clashes and context collapse. Mastodon has the advantage of being a second-mover, and being able to iterate on Bluesky’s implementation. The organisation already has said that they will let users control if they want to be included in a Starter Pack. A new research paper on the lemmygrad.ml Lemmy instance, called “[Exploring Left-Wing Extremism on the Decentralized Web: An Analysis of Lemmygrad.ml]( )“. Within Lemmy there exists a subculture of various instances, most notably Hexbear and Lemmygrad, that self-describes as Marxist and/or leftist, and partially intersects with the developers of Lemmy. There is interesting research to be done on how that sub-community impacts the wider culture of the Threadiverse. This published paper limits itself to data from 2019 to 2022, which misses out on how these communities and cultures have developed over the more recent years. For example, the Hexbear instance was not federating with the rest of the network for a while, only to turn federation back on over a year ago, and it would be interesting to explore how that has impacted other Lemmy servers.## The Links<li>IFTAS has opened their yearly <a href="https://about.iftas.org/2025/08/11/the-2025-fediverse-needs-assessment-is-open-have-your-say/">Needs Assesment</a>, where they “input from moderators, administrators, and community managers across the decentralised social web” to find the needs of the people who are building communities on the social web. </li><li>All of the video’s of the <a href="https://connectedplaces.online/reports/fediverse-report-128/">recent</a> <a href="https://fedicon.ca/">FediCon</a> conference have now been published on <a href="https://spectra.video/c/fedicon_videos/videos">PeerTube</a>.</li><li><a href="https://mastodon.social/@openvibe/114983163912608593">Openvibe</a>, a client that combines Mastodon, Bluesky, Nostr and Threads into a single timeline, now also supports RSS, to be both a <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/08/openvibe-combines-news-and-social-media-in-one-app/">news and social</a> app at the same time.</li><li>Ghost CEO John O’Nolan writes some <a href="https://john.onolan.org/reflections-on-the-social-web/">reflections</a> about Ghost’s recently <a href="https://connectedplaces.online/reports/fediverse-report-128/">launched</a> ActivityPub integration, and how people have perceived it.</li><li>The WordPress ActivityPub team <a href="https://activitypub.blog/2025/08/07/bridging-the-gap/">explains</a> how you can connect a WordPress blog to Bluesky via Bridgy Fed.</li><li>The ‘<a href="https://delightful.coding.social/delightful-fediverse-experience/#fediversity">delightful fediverse experience’ list tracks</a> a large amount of fediverse-related projects, and has been <a href="https://social.coop/@smallcircles/115008779290680972">expanded</a> with some new categories around tools and extensions.</li>#nlnet image